Literature DB >> 8113776

Effectiveness and costs of inpatient versus day hospital cocaine rehabilitation.

A I Alterman1, C P O'Brien, A T McLellan, D S August, E C Snider, M Droba, J W Cornish, C P Hall, A H Raphaelson, F X Schrade.   

Abstract

We compared the effectiveness and costs of day hospital (DH) versus inpatient (INP) rehabilitation for cocaine dependence. The research subjects were 111 inner city, lower socioeconomic, primarily African-American male veterans who qualified for a diagnosis of cocaine dependence and presented no acute medical or psychiatric conditions requiring inpatient treatment. Fifty-six men were randomly assigned to 1 month of DH rehabilitation (27 hours of weekday treatment weekly), and 55 were assigned to 1-month INP rehabilitation (48 hours of scheduled treatment weekly). Treatment outcome was evaluated 7 months after admission into treatment (92% of the subjects), and a cost analysis was performed. A significantly greater proportion of INP subjects (89.1%) completed treatment than did DH subjects (53.6%). Significant improvements in substance use, psychosocial functioning, and health status were found 7 months postadmission for both groups, but there was little evidence of differential improvement between groups. Urine toxicology findings were consistent with the self-report data in showing improvement from baseline, but no group differences in cocaine use. The groups did not differ significantly in post-rehabilitation aftercare participation or in relapse to additional treatment. DH treatment costs were 40% to 60% of INP treatment costs, depending upon the measure used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8113776     DOI: 10.1097/00005053-199403000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis        ISSN: 0022-3018            Impact factor:   2.254


  15 in total

1.  Assessing treatment outcome: how do we interpret the data?

Authors:  G E Woody
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 2.  The cost-effectiveness of substance abuse treatment.

Authors:  P G Barnett
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.285

3.  Day versus inpatient treatment for cocaine dependence: an experimental comparison.

Authors:  R Schneider; C Mittelmeier; D Gadish
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1996

4.  Analysis of the Black Racial Identity Attitude scale in a substance-abusing population.

Authors:  Alfred Harkley; Aiton McLellan; Mary Randall
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.798

5.  Creating an aggregate outcome index: cost-effectiveness analysis of substance abuse treatment.

Authors:  Mireia Jofre-Bonet; Jody L Sindelar
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2004 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.505

6.  The economic costs of substance abuse treatment: updated estimates and cost bands for program assessment and reimbursement.

Authors:  Michael T French; Ioana Popovici; Lauren Tapsell
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2008-02-21

7.  A discrete choice model of drug abuse treatment location.

Authors:  A C Goodman; E Nishiura; J R Hankin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Substance abuse treatment utilization among adults living with HIV/AIDS and alcohol or drug problems.

Authors:  John Orwat; Richard Saitz; Christopher P Tompkins; Debbie M Cheng; Michael P Dentato; Jeffrey H Samet
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2011-06-22

9.  Client incentives versus contracting and staff incentives: how care continuity interventions in substance abuse treatment can improve residential to outpatient transition.

Authors:  Shauna P Acquavita; Sandra Stershic; Rajni Sharma; Maxine Stitzer
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2013-01-30

10.  Cocaine medications, cocaine consumption and societal costs.

Authors:  W S Cartwright
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.