W S Cartwright1. 1. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. wc34b@nih.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the benefits of reduced cocaine consumption in terms of reduced societal costs resulting from the introduction of a medication for cocaine dependence with a small incremental treatment effect. STUDY DESIGN: Cost-benefit analysis is applied to study the implications of reduced cocaine consumption. A modelling approach extrapolates the magnitude of treatment effects. METHODS: Epidemiological data on cocaine use and consumption as well as economic methods of cost-benefit analysis are utilised. Estimates of societal costs associated with heavy users of cocaine, who are most likely addicted and in need of immediate treatment, are developed using 1995 data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: In the first analysis, a postulated 1% reduction in consumption of cocaine among heavy users is examined to approximate a small treatment effect, resulting in a minimal consumption benefit. It is estimated that such a reduction would be valued at $US259 million. The cost-benefit analysis indicated that a cocaine medication with a small treatment effect (10 percentage point increase in abstinence rates) would result in a benefit to cost ratio in the range of 1.58 to 5.79, depending on prescribing behaviour and type of patient. CONCLUSIONS: Such estimates of the benefits of these small treatment effects are conservative, and they may be biased downwards since the willingness to pay for such a cocaine medication could far exceed the benefit to cost estimation used in this paper. Nevertheless, the substantial benefits found in this paper indicate how important investment in cocaine medication is for public health policy; costs may be reduced with efficient prescribing behaviour. Market and governmental barriers to the utilisation of a cocaine medication could reduce the benefits and increase costs. Clinical trials, cost-effectiveness studies, and cost-benefit studies must be conducted to establish the actual pattern of benefits and costs that could be obtained for an efficacious and effective cocaine medication.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the benefits of reduced cocaine consumption in terms of reduced societal costs resulting from the introduction of a medication for cocaine dependence with a small incremental treatment effect. STUDY DESIGN: Cost-benefit analysis is applied to study the implications of reduced cocaine consumption. A modelling approach extrapolates the magnitude of treatment effects. METHODS: Epidemiological data on cocaine use and consumption as well as economic methods of cost-benefit analysis are utilised. Estimates of societal costs associated with heavy users of cocaine, who are most likely addicted and in need of immediate treatment, are developed using 1995 data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: In the first analysis, a postulated 1% reduction in consumption of cocaine among heavy users is examined to approximate a small treatment effect, resulting in a minimal consumption benefit. It is estimated that such a reduction would be valued at $US259 million. The cost-benefit analysis indicated that a cocaine medication with a small treatment effect (10 percentage point increase in abstinence rates) would result in a benefit to cost ratio in the range of 1.58 to 5.79, depending on prescribing behaviour and type of patient. CONCLUSIONS: Such estimates of the benefits of these small treatment effects are conservative, and they may be biased downwards since the willingness to pay for such a cocaine medication could far exceed the benefit to cost estimation used in this paper. Nevertheless, the substantial benefits found in this paper indicate how important investment in cocaine medication is for public health policy; costs may be reduced with efficient prescribing behaviour. Market and governmental barriers to the utilisation of a cocaine medication could reduce the benefits and increase costs. Clinical trials, cost-effectiveness studies, and cost-benefit studies must be conducted to establish the actual pattern of benefits and costs that could be obtained for an efficacious and effective cocaine medication.
Authors: A I Alterman; C P O'Brien; A T McLellan; D S August; E C Snider; M Droba; J W Cornish; C P Hall; A H Raphaelson; F X Schrade Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 1994-03 Impact factor: 2.254
Authors: Ponnada A Narayana; Sushmita Datta; Guozhi Tao; Joel L Steinberg; F Gerard Moeller Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2010-05-31 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Shaine A Cararas; Sari Izenwasser; Dean Wade; Amy Housman; Abha Verma; Stacey A Lomenzo; Mark L Trudell Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: William W Stoops; Justin C Strickland; Lon R Hays; Abner O Rayapati; Joshua A Lile; Craig R Rush Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Van Phuong Hoang; Marian Shanahan; Nagesh Shukla; Pascal Perez; Michael Farrell; Alison Ritter Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-04-13 Impact factor: 2.655