Literature DB >> 8113368

Prognosticating factors in acetabular development following reduction of developmental dysplasia of the hip.

I H Chen1, K N Kuo, J P Lubicky.   

Abstract

A number of predictors that may influence acetabular development after reduction were studied in 75 hips with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Seventy-nine percent of the hips had satisfactory results of Severin group I or II, and 21% had unsatisfactory results. The best predictor of success in a unilateral case is the center-head distance discrepancy (CHDD) measurement at 1 year follow-up. Ninety-six percent of hips with a CHDD of < or = 6% had satisfactory results, whereas 78% with a CHDD > 6% had unsatisfactory results. This study also confirms that age at reduction and significant improvement in the acetabular index in the first year after reduction are important predictors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8113368     DOI: 10.1097/01241398-199401000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  15 in total

1.  Acetabular index is the best predictor of late residual acetabular dysplasia after closed reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  YiQiang Li; YueMing Guo; Ming Li; QingHe Zhou; Yuanzhong Liu; WeiDong Chen; JingChun Li; Federico Canavese; HongWen Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Impact of Failed Pavlik Harness Treatment on the Outcomes Following Closed or Open Reduction in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Authors:  Yong Liu; Lisheng Kan; Jun Sun; Yapeng Zhang
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 1.033

3.  Evaluation of Acetabular Development Following Open Reduction of Developmental Dysplasia of Hip in Children After Walking Age.

Authors:  Sandeep Patwardhan; Arkesh Madegowda; Parag Sancheti
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 1.033

4.  To screen or not to screen? A decision analysis of the utility of screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Susan T Mahan; Jeffrey N Katz; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) between the age of 18 and 24 months.

Authors:  Nabil Alassaf
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-12-21

6.  MR-based parameters as a supplement to radiographs in managing developmental hip dysplasia.

Authors:  Hui-Taek Kim; In-Bo Kim; Jong-Seo Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-08-19

7.  Developmental dysplasia of the hip - angle trends after operation in different age groups.

Authors:  Sonja Milasinovic; Radivoj Brdar; Ivana Petronic; Dejan Nikolic; Dragana Cirovic
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 3.318

8.  Radiographic Outcomes of Ganz versus Modified Triple Osteotomies in Femoral Head Medialization and Coverage in Acetabular Dysplasia.

Authors:  Jui-Yo Hsu; Chia-Che Lee; Sheng-Chieh Lin; Ting-Ming Wang; Ken N Kuo; Kuan-Wen Wu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Closed vs open reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip: The short-term effect on acetabular remodeling.

Authors:  Oussama Abousamra; David Deliberato; Satbir Singh; Kevin E Klingele
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-09-12

10.  Does Adductor Tenotomy Need During Closed Reduction Have a Prognostic Value in the Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Between 6 and 12 Months of Age? "Adductor Tenotomy in the Treatment of Developmental Dysplasia''.

Authors:  Hanifi Ucpunar; Muhammed Mert; Yalkin Camurcu; Hakan Sofu; Timur Yildirim; Avni Ilhan Bayhan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.