Literature DB >> 31865456

Treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) between the age of 18 and 24 months.

Nabil Alassaf1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip between the age of 6 and 18 months starts with closed reduction (CR). If CR is not attainable, open reduction is performed. Open reduction and pelvic osteotomy (ORPO) is usually done directly after the age of two. The aim of this study is to evaluate CR compared to ORPO with respect to early radiographic outcome in patients aged 18 to 24 months at reduction.
METHODS: A single-surgeon cohort was reviewed. Inclusion criteria were age between 18 and 24 months, no prior treatment and minimal follow-up of 2 years. Hips that were not displaced or had a nonidiopathic cause were excluded. Residual dysplasia was defined as a center edge angle (CEA) of less than 15° or CEA less than 20° with an acetabular index (AI) of more than 30°. Multiple regression was used, the outcome was follow-up CEA, and the explanatory variables were age, sex, type of surgery, international hip dysplasia grade and preoperative AI. Values of preoperative AI in the CR group and follow-up CEA were plotted.
RESULTS: Eighty-two hips in fifty patients were included. Residual dysplasia was identified in 16 hips (20%), 12 (27%) after CR, and 4 (11%) after ORPO (p = 0.10). Recurrence and avascular necrosis rates were not statistically different. Preoperative AI and type of surgery independently affected CEA. CR patients with a preoperative AI of more the 40° had a 50% (10/20) risk of residual dysplasia.
CONCLUSION: CR is an important option to consider in selected patients between the age of 18 and 24 months and the selection should not be based on intraoperative assessment only, but also on preoperative measurement of AI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Closed reduction; Congenital hip dislocation; Hip dysplasia; Pediatric

Year:  2019        PMID: 31865456     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-019-02601-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  24 in total

1.  Late reduction in congenital dislocation of the hip and the need for secondary surgery: radiologic predictors and confounding variables.

Authors:  Benjamin J Bolland; Abdul Wahed; Sariyah Al-Hallao; David J Culliford; Nicholas M P Clarke
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2010 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.324

2.  Prediction of acetabular development after closed reduction by overhead traction in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kitoh; Takahiko Kitakoji; Mitsuyasu Katoh; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.601

3.  Acetabular index is the best predictor of late residual acetabular dysplasia after closed reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  YiQiang Li; YueMing Guo; Ming Li; QingHe Zhou; Yuanzhong Liu; WeiDong Chen; JingChun Li; Federico Canavese; HongWen Xu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Acetabular development after reduction in congenital dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  J R Lindstrom; I V Ponseti; D R Wenger
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Acetabular development in the infant's dislocated hips.

Authors:  D L Cherney; G W Westin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Acetabular dysplasia after treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip. Implications for secondary procedures.

Authors:  J Albinana; L A Dolan; K F Spratt; J Morcuende; M D Meyer; S L Weinstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-08

7.  Outcome at forty-five years after open reduction and innominate osteotomy for late-presenting developmental dislocation of the hip.

Authors:  Simon R Thomas; John H Wedge; Robert B Salter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Acetabular Remodeling and Role of Osteotomy After Closed Reduction of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Authors:  Chang Ho Shin; Won Joon Yoo; Moon Seok Park; Jun Ho Kim; In Ho Choi; Tae-Joon Cho
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Reliability of a New Radiographic Classification for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Authors:  Unni Narayanan; Kishore Mulpuri; Wudbhav N Sankar; Nicholas M P Clarke; Harish Hosalkar; Charles T Price
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

10.  Single-leg spica provides adequate stability after open reduction in developmental dysplasia of the hip.

Authors:  Nabil Alassaf
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  3 in total

1.  Impact of Failed Pavlik Harness Treatment on the Outcomes Following Closed or Open Reduction in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip.

Authors:  Yong Liu; Lisheng Kan; Jun Sun; Yapeng Zhang
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 1.033

2.  Retrospective Comparison of Outcomes Between Closed and Open Reduction for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip in Children Aged 6-24 Months.

Authors:  Shuyu Ma; Weizheng Zhou; Lianyong Li; Enbo Wang; Lijun Zhang; Qiwei Li
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 1.033

3.  Narrative Review of Complications Following DDH Treatment.

Authors:  Raghav Badrinath; Caitlin Orner; James D Bomar; Vidyadhar V Upasani
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 1.251

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.