Literature DB >> 8113272

Modular uncemented prosthetic reconstruction after resection of tumours of the distal femur.

R Capanna1, H G Morris, D Campanacci, M Del Ben, M Campanacci.   

Abstract

We report the use of the uncemented Kotz modular femur and tibia reconstruction system after 95 distal femoral resections performed from 1983 to 1989. The average follow-up was 51 months; 62 patients had at least 36 months' follow-up and 36 at least 60 months. Complications required reoperation in 55%. The postoperative infection rate was 5% for primary cases, 6% for revision cases, and 43% for revision of previously infected cases. The polyethylene bushes failed in 42% of cases at an average of 64 months postoperatively. Stem breakage occurred in 6% and was associated with the use of narrow stems and extensive quadriceps excision. The radiological results were excellent or good in most cases and were related to the initial screw fixation, but not to age, chemotherapy, length of resection or size of stem. The clinical results were excellent or good in 75%, failure usually being associated with a complication, especially infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8113272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  42 in total

1.  Distal femoral osteoarticular allografts: long-term survival, but frequent complications.

Authors:  Patrick C Toy; Jeremy R White; Mark T Scarborough; William F Enneking; C Parker Gibbs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Revision of broken knee megaprostheses: new solution to old problems.

Authors:  Manish Agarwal; Ashish Gulia; B Ravi; Rupesh Ghyar; Ajay Puri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Management of infection following reconstruction in bone tumors.

Authors:  Sudhir K Kapoor; Rajesh Thiyam
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-07-07

Review 4.  Megaprostheses for the treatment of malignant bone tumours of the lower limbs.

Authors:  Christian Heisel; Stefan Kinkel; Ludger Bernd; Volker Ewerbeck
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Limb Salvage Versus Amputation in Conventional Appendicular Osteosarcoma: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Julio J Jauregui; Vidushan Nadarajah; Joseph Munn; Robert Pivec; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Daniel M Lerman; Aditya V Maheshwari
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-01-20

Review 6.  [Revision of tumour endoprostheses around the knee joint. Review and own results].

Authors:  R Windhager; A Leithner; M Hochegger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Early equivalence of uncemented press-fit and Compress femoral fixation.

Authors:  German L Farfalli; Patrick J Boland; Carol D Morris; Edward A Athanasian; John H Healey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Treatment solutions are unclear for perimegaprosthetic infections.

Authors:  Lisa B Ercolano; Tyson Christensen; Richard McGough; Kurt Weiss
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Compress periprosthetic fractures: interface stability and ease of revision.

Authors:  Wakenda K Tyler; John H Healey; Carol D Morris; Patrick J Boland; Richard J O'Donnell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Resection arthrodesis for the management of aggressive giant cell tumor of the distal femur.

Authors:  Ayman Abdelaziz Bassiony; Mohamed Abdelrahman; Amr Abdelhady; Mohamed Kamal Assal
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.