Literature DB >> 8113249

The influence of a hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate coating on bone growth into titanium fiber-metal implants.

C L Tisdel1, V M Goldberg, J A Parr, J S Bensusan, L S Staikoff, S Stevenson.   

Abstract

A study was done in rabbits to determine the effect of a hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate coating on bone growth into titanium fiber-metal implants. Titanium fiber rods with a solid titanium core were implanted bilaterally into the distal aspect of the femora of fifty-five New Zealand White rabbits. One rod was uncoated and the other rod was surface-coated with hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate by the plasma-spray technique. Thirty-five rabbits were labeled sequentially with fluorochromes; killed at one, two, three, four, six, twelve, or twenty-four weeks after the operation; and studied histologically and histomorphometrically. The implants in the remaining twenty rabbits were subjected to pull-out testing to determine the shear strength at the implant-bone interface at three, six, twelve, and twenty-four weeks after the operation. Histomorphometry revealed significant effects of the hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate coating. When whole-group means (which included all time-points) were compared, it was found that 44 per cent of the perimeter of the hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate-coated implants was covered with bone compared with 12 per cent of the perimeter of the uncoated implants. The percentage of the internal surface of the implant that was covered with bone was also significantly higher in the hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate-coated implants: 27 per cent of the internal surface of the coated implants was covered compared with 8 per cent in the uncoated implants. The amount of bone in the pores of the implants was also higher in the hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate-coated implants: 12 per cent of the available pore space in the hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate-coated implants was filled with bone compared with 4 per cent in the uncoated implants. Scanning electron microscopy of the implants, done in backscatter mode, demonstrated apposition of new bone directly on the hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate coating, with variable degrees (amounts) of hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate resorption and new-bone replacement over time. Bone was never directly apposed to uncoated titanium fiber-metal. The pull-out strength of the hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate-coated implants was consistently greater than that of the uncoated implants, at all time-periods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8113249     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199402000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  12 in total

1.  Bilayered calcium phosphate coating to promote osseointegration of a femoral stem prosthesis.

Authors:  E Goyenvalle; N J M Guyen; E Aguado; N Passuti; G Daculsi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Histomorphological study of bone response to hydroxyapatite coating on stainless steel.

Authors:  A Merolli; A Moroni; C Faldini; P Tranquilli Leali; S Giannini
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 3.  Implant surface characteristics and their effect on osseointegration.

Authors:  A Barfeie; J Wilson; J Rees
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  Comparison of mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and differentiation between biomimetic and electrochemical coatings on different topographic surfaces.

Authors:  Elena García-Gareta; Jia Hua; Jonathan C Knowles; Gordon W Blunn
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 5.  Nanotechnology approaches to improve dental implants.

Authors:  Antoni P Tomisa; Maximilien E Launey; Janice S Lee; Mahesh H Mankani; Ulrike G K Wegst; Eduardo Saiz
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Bone remodeling and hydroxyapatite resorption in coated primary hip prostheses.

Authors:  Alphons J Tonino; Bart C H van der Wal; Ide C Heyligers; Bernd Grimm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  An in vivo evaluation of bone response to three implant surfaces using a rabbit intramedullary rod model.

Authors:  Juan C Hermida; Arnie Bergula; Fred Dimaano; Monica Hawkins; Clifford W Colwell; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Thin-layer hydroxyapatite deposition on a nanofiber surface stimulates mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and their differentiation into osteoblasts.

Authors:  Eva Prosecká; Matej Buzgo; Michala Rampichová; Tomáš Kocourek; Petra Kochová; Lucie Vysloužilová; Daniel Tvrdík; Miroslav Jelínek; David Lukáš; Evžen Amler
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2012-01-29

9.  Cementless hydroxyapatite coated hip prostheses.

Authors:  Antonio Herrera; Jesús Mateo; Jorge Gil-Albarova; Antonio Lobo-Escolar; Elena Ibarz; Sergio Gabarre; Yolanda Más; Luis Gracia
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  In vivo testing of porous Ti-25Nb alloy serving as a femoral stem prosthesis in a rabbit model.

Authors:  Xiaojun Weng; Hailin Yang; Jian Xu; Xiaosheng Li; Qiande Liao; Jing Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.