Literature DB >> 811324

A comparative study of deep avian foveas.

K V Fite, S Rosenfield-Wessels.   

Abstract

The foveas of nine avian species, initially selected for the presence of a deep fovea and representing a wide range of eye sizes and ecological habits, were studied with quantitative light microscope techniques. Considerable variation was observed in the location and configuration of the avian foveas, although they appeared to be 'convexiclivate' in shape when compared with the fovea of the rhesus monkey. Comparisons of foveal cell densities (receptor nuclei and ganglion cells) across species showed an increase in the average number of cells/visual degree2 with increasing eye size; similarly, an increase occurred in receptor nuclei relative to ganglion cell density. Thus, smaller eyes showed a coarser retinal grain and a lower 'concidence ratio' of receptors to ganglion cells than was found in the largest eyes. There appeared to be no relationship between receptor densities/mm2 and (a) eye size, (b) depth of foveal clivus, or (c) width of foveal clivus. However, a negative correlation was generally observed between the width of the foveal clivus and eye size. Two foveas were seen in the red-tailed hawk, goshawk, sparrow hawk, and least tern. The central fovea was more differentiated, with greate densities of both receptor nuclei and ganglion cells than was observed in the emporal fovea of the same species. Further conclusions, particularly with respect to potential visual acuity, await quantitative measurements of foveal cone densities across species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 811324     DOI: 10.1159/000124142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  24 in total

1.  Retinal structure of birds of prey revealed by ultra-high resolution spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Marco Ruggeri; James C Major; Craig McKeown; Robert W Knighton; Carmen A Puliafito; Shuliang Jiao
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Relative Wulst volume is correlated with orbit orientation and binocular visual field in birds.

Authors:  Andrew N Iwaniuk; Christopher P Heesy; Margaret I Hall; Douglas R W Wylie
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Retinal ganglion cell topography and visual acuity of the sleepy lizard (Tiliqua rugosa).

Authors:  Shaun T D New; C Michael Bull
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  From optics to attention: visual perception in barn owls.

Authors:  Wolf M Harmening; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Ecomorphology of eye shape and retinal topography in waterfowl (Aves: Anseriformes: Anatidae) with different foraging modes.

Authors:  Thomas J Lisney; Karyn Stecyk; Jeffrey Kolominsky; Brian K Schmidt; Jeremy R Corfield; Andrew N Iwaniuk; Douglas R Wylie
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Interspecifc variation in eye shape and retinal topography in seven species of galliform bird (Aves: Galliformes: Phasianidae).

Authors:  Thomas J Lisney; Andrew N Iwaniuk; Jeffrey Kolominsky; Mischa V Bandet; Jeremy R Corfield; Douglas R Wylie
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 7.  The marmoset monkey as a model for visual neuroscience.

Authors:  Jude F Mitchell; David A Leopold
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 3.304

8.  Visual fixation of a landing perch by chickens.

Authors:  Christine Moinard; Kenneth M D Rutherford; Poppy Statham; Patrick R Green
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Hawk eyes II: diurnal raptors differ in head movement strategies when scanning from perches.

Authors:  Colleen T O'Rourke; Todd Pitlik; Melissa Hoover; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  [Contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in animals].

Authors:  W M Harmening
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.