Literature DB >> 22806571

Interspecifc variation in eye shape and retinal topography in seven species of galliform bird (Aves: Galliformes: Phasianidae).

Thomas J Lisney1, Andrew N Iwaniuk, Jeffrey Kolominsky, Mischa V Bandet, Jeremy R Corfield, Douglas R Wylie.   

Abstract

Eye morphology and the retinal topography of animals that live in either 'open' (e.g., grassland) or 'enclosed' (e.g., forest) terrestrial habitats show common adaptations to constraints imposed by these different habitat types. Although relationships between habitat and the visual system are well documented in most vertebrates, relatively few studies have examined this relationship in birds. Here, we compare eye shape and retinal topography across seven species from the family Phasianidae (Galliformes) that are diurnally active in either open or enclosed habitats. Species from enclosed habitats have significantly larger corneal diameters, relative to transverse diameters, than species from open habitats, which we predict serves to enhance visual sensitivity. Retinal topography, however, was similar across all seven species and consisted of a centrally positioned area centralis and a weak horizontal visual streak, with no discernible fovea. In the Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica), there was also a dorso-temporal extension of increased neuron density and, in some specimens, a putative area dorsalis. The total number of neurons in the retinal ganglion cell layer was correlated with retinal whole-mount area. Average and peak neuron densities were similar across species, with the exception of the Japanese quail, which had greater average and peak densities. Peak anatomical spatial resolving power was also similar among species, ranging from approximately 10-13 cycles/°. Overall, the pattern of retinal topography we found in phasianids is associated with ground-foraging in birds and presumably facilitates the identification of small food items on the ground as well as other visually guided behaviors, irrespective of habitat type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22806571     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-012-0742-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  56 in total

1.  Retinal cone topography of artiodactyl mammals: influence of body height and habitat.

Authors:  Alexandra Nathalie Schiviz; Thomas Ruf; Anna Kuebber-Heiss; Christian Schubert; Peter Kurt Ahnelt
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  Testing the terrain hypothesis: Canada geese see their world laterally and obliquely.

Authors:  Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Bret A Moore; Megan Doppler; Joseph Freeman; Bradley F Blackwell; Steven L Lima; Travis L DeVault
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 1.808

3.  Photoreceptor diameter and spacing for highest resolving power.

Authors:  A W Snyder; W H Miller
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1977-05

4.  Distribution and morphology of retinal ganglion cells in the Japanese quail.

Authors:  M Ikushima; M Watanabe; H Ito
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1986-06-25       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Retinal topography in reef teleosts. II. Some species with prominent horizontal streaks and high-density areae.

Authors:  S P Collin; J D Pettigrew
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.808

6.  The topographical distribution of rods and cones in the adult chicken retina.

Authors:  D B Meyer; H C May
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1973-11-25       Impact factor: 3.467

7.  Effects of habitat light intensity on mammalian eye shape.

Authors:  Carrie C Veilleux; Rebecca J Lewis
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 2.064

8.  Kainic acid destroys displaced amacrine cells in post-hatch chicken retina.

Authors:  D Ehrlich; I G Morgan
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  The distribution of displaced ganglion cells in the retina of the pigeon.

Authors:  B P Hayes; A L Holden
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Cell populations of the ganglion cell layer: displaced amacrine and matching amacrine cells in the pigeon retina.

Authors:  B P Hayes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  7 in total

1.  Ecomorphology of eye shape and retinal topography in waterfowl (Aves: Anseriformes: Anatidae) with different foraging modes.

Authors:  Thomas J Lisney; Karyn Stecyk; Jeffrey Kolominsky; Brian K Schmidt; Jeremy R Corfield; Andrew N Iwaniuk; Douglas R Wylie
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Retinal ganglion cell topography and spatial resolution of two parrot species: budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) and Bourke's parrot (Neopsephotus bourkii).

Authors:  Mindaugas Mitkus; Sandra Chaib; Olle Lind; Almut Kelber
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Electrophysiological measures of temporal resolution, contrast sensitivity and spatial resolving power in sharks.

Authors:  Laura A Ryan; Jan M Hemmi; Shaun P Collin; Nathan S Hart
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  Understanding the retinal basis of vision across species.

Authors:  Tom Baden; Thomas Euler; Philipp Berens
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 5.  What Drives Bird Vision? Bill Control and Predator Detection Overshadow Flight.

Authors:  Graham R Martin
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  The impact of domestication on the chicken optical apparatus.

Authors:  Lina S V Roth; Olle Lind
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Mosaic and concerted evolution in the visual system of birds.

Authors:  Cristián Gutiérrez-Ibáñez; Andrew N Iwaniuk; Bret A Moore; Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Jeremy R Corfield; Justin M Krilow; Jeffrey Kolominsky; Douglas R Wylie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.