Literature DB >> 8113110

Comparison of continuous and pulsed low dose rate brachytherapy: biological equivalence in vivo.

K A Mason1, H D Thames, T G Ochran, A C Ruifrok, N Janjan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent studies of human cell lines cultured in vitro and mathematical modeling of the response of acute and late responding tissues have predicted conditions for the equivalence in terms of cell killing of continuous and pulsed dose rate brachytherapy. The aim of this study was to test these predictions in vivo using an acutely responding normal tissue. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The microcolony assay was used to quantify the survival of jejunal stem cells in vivo. Mice were exposed to graded doses of 60Co delivered continuously or as 1- or 10-min pulses given once-per-hour at an average dose rate of 0.7 Gy/hr. In both cases the total dose-per-hour was 0.7 Gy. Overall exposure times ranged between about 30 and 60 h. Mice were sacrificed 3.5 days after exposure, the bowel removed for routine histological preparation, and number of surviving crypts quantified microscopically.
RESULTS: An average dose-per-hour of 0.7 Gy, a pulse width of 10 min, and a pulse frequency of 1 h resulted in biological equivalence of pulsed to continuous treatment. Delivering the pulse in a period of 1 min at a dose rate 10-fold higher resulted in a modest 3-4% shift in the survival curve to lower isoeffective doses. The slopes of the survival curves as described by D(o) values were similar for all treatment regimens tested.
CONCLUSION: This in vivo study validates the prediction of biological equivalence between pulsed and continuous brachytherapy at a clinically relevant average dose rate and may generate further interest in this new treatment modality because of its advantages in radiation protection, dose optimization, and cost relative to standard low dose rate brachytherapy techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8113110     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90192-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  6 in total

Review 1.  A review of the clinical experience in pulsed dose rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Brian V Balgobind; Kees Koedooder; Diego Ordoñez Zúñiga; Raquel Dávila Fajardo; Coen R N Rasch; Bradley R Pieters
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  [Effects of fractionation and dose rate in PDR brachytherapy of B14 cells].

Authors:  L Keilholz; M H Seegenschmiedt; M Lotter; R Schulz-Wendtland; J von Erffa; S Pflüger; R Sauer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  [In vitro studies of PDR brachytherapy].

Authors:  P Fritz; C Frank; K J Weber
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Re-irradiation of the chest wall for local breast cancer recurrence : Results of salvage brachytherapy with hyperthermia.

Authors:  A Auoragh; V Strnad; O J Ott; M W Beckmann; R Fietkau
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 5.  High-dose-rate and pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy for oral cavity cancer and oropharynx cancer.

Authors:  Alfredo Polo
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2010-01-13

6.  Influence of length of interval between pulses in PDR brachytherapy (PDRBT) on value of Biologically Equivalent Dose (BED) in healthy tissues.

Authors:  Janusz Skowronek; Julian Malicki; Grzegorz Zwierzchowski; Tomasz Piotrowski
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2010-07-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.