Literature DB >> 8110749

Protonation and free energy changes associated with formation of QBH2 in native and Glu-L212-->Gln mutant reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

P H McPherson1, M Schönfeld, M L Paddock, M Y Okamura, G Feher.   

Abstract

Formation of the quinol QBH2 in Glu-L212-->Gln mutant [EQ(L212)] reaction centers (RCs) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides was investigated by measuring the proton uptake (using dyes), UV absorption changes, and free energy changes associated with the two-electron reduction of QB. The advantage of using the EQ(L212) RCs for these studies is that the individual protonation steps can be kinetically resolved and analyzed; conclusions reached regarding the mechanism of formation of QBH2 are expected to apply also to native RCs. The proton uptake by EQ(L212) RCs was strongly biphasic: the fast phase was essentially concomitant with the second electron transfer to QB- (approximately 1 ms at pH 7.5); the slow phase was approximately 2000-fold slower. The rate constant of the slow phase depended on the redox state of the primary quinone QA; for QA- the rate constant was larger (i.e., 8-fold at pH 6.0) than for QA. The electron and proton transfers to QB- in EQ(L212) RCs were modeled with a two-step scheme as follows: (1) fast, QA-QB- + H+(1)-->QA(QBH)-; (2) slow, QA(QBH)- + H+(2)-->QAQBH2, where reaction 1 involves concomitant electron transfer and proton uptake [Paddock, M. L., McPherson, P. H., Feher, G., & Okamura, M. Y. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87, 6803-6807]. The stoichiometry of the fast proton uptake associated with the two-electron reduction of QB varied from 1.1 to 1.4 H+/2e- at pH 6.5-8.5, consistent with the uptake of H+(1) plus an additional fractional proton uptake due to amino acid residues whose pKa values are shifted by interactions with the charge of (QBH)-. The total steady-state proton uptake stoichiometry was 2.0 H+/2e- at pH < or = 7.5, consistent with the formation of the quinol QBH2 (reactions 1 and 2). At pH 8.5, the steady-state proton uptake was 1.6 +/- 0.1 H+/2e-, which is consistent with an apparent pKa for H+(2) of approximately 8.5 [McPherson, P. H., Okamura, M. Y., & Feher, G. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1144, 309-324]. The proton uptake kinetics indicate that Glu-L212 is a component of the proton transfer chain for H+(2) that connects reduced QB (buried in the RC protein) to the aqueous solvent as proposed previously [Paddock, M. L., Rongey, S. H., Feher, G., & Okamura, M. Y. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 6602-6606].(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8110749     DOI: 10.1021/bi00171a018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  10 in total

1.  Key role of proline L209 in connecting the distant quinone pockets in the reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  J Tandori; P Maroti; E Alexov; P Sebban; L Baciou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Molecular dynamics of a protein surface: ion-residues interactions.

Authors:  Ran Friedman; Esther Nachliel; Menachem Gutman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-05-13       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Conformational gating of the electron transfer reaction QA-.QB --> QAQB-. in bacterial reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides determined by a driving force assay.

Authors:  M S Graige; G Feher; M Y Okamura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Coupling of cytochrome and quinone turnovers in the photocycle of reaction centers from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  S Osváth; P Maróti
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Protein surface dynamics: interaction with water and small solutes.

Authors:  Ran Friedman; Esther Nachliel; Menachem Gutman
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.365

Review 6.  Molecular mechanisms for generating transmembrane proton gradients.

Authors:  M R Gunner; Muhamed Amin; Xuyu Zhu; Jianxun Lu
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-03-16

7.  Proton uptake by bacterial reaction centers: the protein complex responds in a similar manner to the reduction of either quinone acceptor.

Authors:  J Miksovska; M Schiffer; D K Hanson; P Sebban
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Calculated coupling of electron and proton transfer in the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodopseudomonas viridis.

Authors:  C R Lancaster; H Michel; B Honig; M R Gunner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Identification of the proton pathway in bacterial reaction centers: both protons associated with reduction of QB to QBH2 share a common entry point.

Authors:  P Adelroth; M L Paddock; L B Sagle; G Feher; M Y Okamura
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The redox midpoint potential of the primary quinone of reaction centers in chromatophores of Rhodobacter sphaeroides is pH independent.

Authors:  Péter Maróti; Colin A Wraight
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 1.733

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.