Literature DB >> 8109576

Implications of measurement error in exposure for the sample sizes of case-control studies.

G E McKeown-Eyssen1, R Tibshirani.   

Abstract

In this paper, recent results describing the effects of measurement error on estimation of the association between an exposure and a disease are applied to sample size calculation in case-control studies. Models of the relation between true exposure and a surrogate exposure measure assessed with error are used to derive equations for sample size determination. The results show that the sample size of a study based on an exposure variable which is measured with error must be larger by a factor of 1/rho 2 than if exposure were measured without error, where rho is the correlation between the true exposure and the surrogate exposure measure. Review of the magnitude of measurement error in dietary assessments suggests that failure to account for measurement error in sample size determination for case-control studies of diet and disease could lead to marked underestimation of the required sample size.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8109576     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  12 in total

Review 1.  Methods for assessing the extent of exposure and effects of air pollution.

Authors:  M Krzyzanowski
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  STRATOS guidance document on measurement error and misclassification of variables in observational epidemiology: Part 1-Basic theory and simple methods of adjustment.

Authors:  Ruth H Keogh; Pamela A Shaw; Paul Gustafson; Raymond J Carroll; Veronika Deffner; Kevin W Dodd; Helmut Küchenhoff; Janet A Tooze; Michael P Wallace; Victor Kipnis; Laurence S Freedman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Evaluation of energy and dietary intake estimates from a food frequency questionnaire using independent energy expenditure measurement and weighed food records.

Authors:  Monica H Carlsen; Inger T L Lillegaard; Anette Karlsen; Rune Blomhoff; Christian A Drevon; Lene F Andersen
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  Reproducibility of serum pituitary hormones in women.

Authors:  Alan A Arslan; Yian Gu; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Karen L Koenig; Mengling Liu; Lyudmila Velikokhatnaya; Roy E Shore; Paolo Toniolo; Faina Linkov; Anna E Lokshin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Power/sample size calculations for assessing correlates of risk in clinical efficacy trials.

Authors:  Peter B Gilbert; Holly E Janes; Yunda Huang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Reliability of plasma carotenoid biomarkers and its relation to study power.

Authors:  Wael K Al-Delaimy; Loki Natarajan; Xiaoying Sun; Cheryl L Rock; John P Pierce; John J Pierce
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Lifetime body size and reproductive factors: comparisons of data recorded prospectively with self reports in middle age.

Authors:  Benjamin J Cairns; Bette Liu; Suzanne Clennell; Rachel Cooper; Gillian K Reeves; Valerie Beral; Diana Kuh
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Investigating the performance of 24-h urinary sucrose and fructose as a biomarker of total sugars intake in US participants - a controlled feeding study.

Authors:  Natasha Tasevska; Virag Sagi-Kiss; Susana A Palma-Duran; Brian Barrett; Matthew Chaloux; John Commins; Diane M O'Brien; Carol S Johnston; Douglas Midthune; Victor Kipnis; Laurence S Freedman
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 8.472

9.  Reliability of follicle-stimulating hormone measurements in serum.

Authors:  Alan A Arslan; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Annekatrin Lukanova; Sabina Rinaldi; Rudolf Kaaks; Paolo Toniolo
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Validity over time of self-reported anthropometric variables during follow-up of a large cohort of UK women.

Authors:  F Lucy Wright; Jane Green; Gillian Reeves; Valerie Beral; Benjamin J Cairns
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.