Literature DB >> 8106908

Cisplatin-VP16 alternating with cyclophosphamide-epirubicin versus cyclophosphamide-epirubicin-vincristine in small cell lung cancer.

A Farris1, M Bisail, M G Sarobba, G Sanna, T Scotto, S Valzelli, C Intini.   

Abstract

In the hope of increasing the incidence of objective remissions and the survival time of patients with small cell lung cancer, we conducted a randomized study designed to compare a treatment scheme of alternating chemotherapy featuring cisplatin+etoposide followed by cyclophosphamide+epirubicin versus conventional chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide+epirubicin+vincristine, in a total of 113 patients (56 treated with the alternating regime and 57 treated conventionally). Patients receiving the alternating drug regimen showed some increase in objective remission rates, and above all increased mean survival time (297 days versus 232). The higher incidence of side effects encountered was effectively controlled by the usual medical therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8106908     DOI: 10.1080/1120009x.1993.11741080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chemother        ISSN: 1120-009X            Impact factor:   1.714


  2 in total

Review 1.  Platinum versus non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Isuru U Amarasena; Saion Chatterjee; Julia A E Walters; Richard Wood-Baker; Kwun M Fong
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-02

2.  Is there a case for cisplatin in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer? A meta-analysis of randomized trials of a cisplatin-containing regimen versus a regimen without this alkylating agent.

Authors:  J L Pujol; L Carestia; J P Daurès
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.