Literature DB >> 26233609

Platinum versus non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for small cell lung cancer.

Isuru U Amarasena1, Saion Chatterjee, Julia A E Walters, Richard Wood-Baker, Kwun M Fong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a very fast growing form of cancer and is characterised by early metastasis. As a result, chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment. A number of different platinum-based chemotherapy regimens and non-platinum-based chemotherapy regimens have been used for the treatment of SCLC, with varying results. This review was conducted to analyse the data from these studies in order to compare their effectiveness.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of platinum chemotherapy regimens compared with non-platinum chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of SCLC with respect to survival, tumour response, toxicity and quality of life. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched the biomedical literature databases CENTRAL (TheCochrane Library 2014, Issue 7), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL from 1966 to August 2014. In addition, we handsearched reference lists from relevant resources. SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomised controlled trials involving patients with pathologically confirmed SCLC (including both limited-stage disease and extensive-stage disease) and the use of a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen in at least one treatment arm and a non-platinum-based chemotherapy regimen in a separate arm. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by the Cochrane Collaboration. Two authors independently assessed search results. We assessed included studies for methodological quality and recorded the following outcome data: survival, tumour response, toxicity and quality of life. We combined the results of the survival, tumour response and toxicity data in a meta-analysis. Quality-of-life data were analysed individually. MAIN
RESULTS: A total of 32 studies involving 6075 patients with SCLC were included in this systematic review. The majority of studies were multi-centre randomised controlled trials conducted throughout Europe, North America and Asia with the earliest study publishing data in 1981 and the latest in 2014. The duration of studies ranged from 12 to 72 months with a median of 32 months. The median age of patients in the vast majority of studies was between 60 and 65 years of age. Eighteen studies presented data on extensive-stage disease. Nine studies presented data on limited-stage disease. Eleven studies did not present data based on the disease stage. These data were analysed separately in subgroup analyses. Sixteen (50%) studies were of good quality with a low risk of bias and the data from these studies were analysed separately in a heterogeneity analysis.There was no statistically significant difference between treatment groups in terms of survival at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. There was also no statistically significant difference in terms of overall tumour response. However, platinum-based treatment regimens did have a significantly higher rate of complete response. Platinum-based chemotherapy regimens had significantly higher rates of nausea and vomiting and thrombocytopenia toxicity. Four trials presented quality-of-life data, but, due to the different systems used to measure quality of life this data could not be combined in a meta-analysis. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Platinum-based chemotherapy regimens did not offer a statistically significant benefit in survival or overall tumour response compared with non-platinum-based regimens. However, platinum-based chemotherapy regimens did increase complete response rates, at the cost of higher adverse events including nausea and vomiting, anaemia and thrombocytopenia toxicity. These data suggest non-platinum chemotherapy regimens have a more advantageous risk-benefit profile. This systematic review highlights the lack of quality-of-life data in trials involving chemotherapy treatment for SCLC. With poor long-term survival associated with both treatment groups, the issue of the quality of the survival period takes on even more significance. It would be beneficial for future trials in this area to include a quality-of-life assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26233609      PMCID: PMC7263420          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006849.pub3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  58 in total

1.  The addition of cisplatin to cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-etoposide combination chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with small cell lung carcinoma: A randomized study of 457 patients. "Petites Cellules" Group.

Authors:  T Urban; C Chastang; F X Lebas; J P Duhamel; G Adam; J Darse; J M Bréchot; B Lebeau
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Randomized phase II trial of high-dose 4'-epi-doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide versus high-dose 4'-epi-doxorubicin + cisplatin in previously untreated patients with extensive small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  E Kánitz; K Kolaric; J Jassem; Z Mechl; M Pawlicki; G Ringwald; J Rolski; Z Schoket; D Vukas; E Kaplan
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.935

3.  Randomized phase III trial of cisplatin/irinotecan versus cisplatin/etoposide in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Primo N Lara; David R Gandara; Ronald B Natale
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.785

4.  Cisplatin and etoposide regimen is superior to cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and vincristine regimen in small-cell lung cancer: results from a randomized phase III trial with 5 years' follow-up.

Authors:  Stein Sundstrøm; Roy M Bremnes; Stein Kaasa; Ulf Aasebø; Reidulv Hatlevoll; Ragnar Dahle; Nils Boye; Mari Wang; Tor Vigander; Jan Vilsvik; Eva Skovlund; Einar Hannisdal; Steinar Aamdal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Standard versus alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy in extensive small cell lung cancer: an EORTC Phase III trial.

Authors:  P E Postmus; G Scagliotti; H J Groen; F Gozzelino; J T Burghouts; D Curran; T Sahmoud; A Kirkpatrick; G Giaccone; T A Splinter
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Five-day oral etoposide treatment for advanced small-cell lung cancer: randomized comparison with intravenous chemotherapy.

Authors:  R L Souhami; S G Spiro; R M Rudd; M C Ruiz de Elvira; L E James; N H Gower; A Lamont; P G Harper
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-04-16       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  CVM versus ACE in the treatment of small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  A L Jones; J Holborn; S Ashley; I E Smith
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.935

8.  Long-term results of a phase III trial comparing once-daily radiotherapy with twice-daily radiotherapy in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Steven E Schild; James A Bonner; Thomas G Shanahan; Burke J Brooks; Randolph S Marks; Susan M Geyer; Shauna L Hillman; Gist H Farr; Henry D Tazelaar; James E Krook; Francois J Geoffroy; Muhammad Salim; Robert M Arusell; James A Mailliard; Paul L Schaefer; James R Jett
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  Platinum versus non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Isuru U Amarasena; Julia A E Walters; Richard Wood-Baker; Kwun Fong
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

Review 10.  Epidemiology of lung cancer.

Authors:  Anthony J Alberg; Jonathan M Samet
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  13 in total

1.  The microRNA expression signature of small cell lung cancer: tumor suppressors of miR-27a-5p and miR-34b-3p and their targeted oncogenes.

Authors:  Keiko Mizuno; Hiroko Mataki; Takayuki Arai; Atsushi Okato; Kazuto Kamikawaji; Tomohiro Kumamoto; Tsubasa Hiraki; Kazuhito Hatanaka; Hiromasa Inoue; Naohiko Seki
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.172

2.  Prediction of tumour pathological subtype from genomic profile using sparse logistic regression with random effects.

Authors:  Özlem Kaymaz; Khaled Alqahtani; Henry M Wood; Arief Gusnanto
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 1.416

Review 3.  Prolonging Survival: The Role of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Barbara Melosky; Parneet K Cheema; Anthony Brade; Deanna McLeod; Geoffrey Liu; Paul Wheatley Price; Kevin Jao; Devin D Schellenberg; Rosalyn Juergens; Natasha Leighl; Quincy Chu
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-09-23

4.  Enhanced eryptosis contributes to anemia in lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Rosi Bissinger; Carla Schumacher; Syed M Qadri; Sabina Honisch; Abaid Malik; Friedrich Götz; Hans-Georg Kopp; Florian Lang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-22

5.  Impact of MET inhibition on small-cell lung cancer cells showing aberrant activation of the hepatocyte growth factor/MET pathway.

Authors:  Hirokazu Taniguchi; Tadaaki Yamada; Shinji Takeuchi; Sachiko Arai; Koji Fukuda; Shuichi Sakamoto; Manabu Kawada; Hiroyuki Yamaguchi; Hiroshi Mukae; Seiji Yano
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 6.716

Review 6.  Angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC): A meta-analysis of 7 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Qing Li; Tao Wu; Li Jing; Miao-Jing Li; Tao Tian; Zhi-Ping Ruan; Xuan Liang; Ke-Jun Nan; Zhi-Yan Liu; Yu Yao; Hui Guo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Adherence to recommended clinical guidelines in extensive disease small-cell lung cancer across the US, Europe, and Japan.

Authors:  Marco D DiBonaventura; Bijal Shah-Manek; Karen Higginbottom; John R Penrod; Yong Yuan
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  A Phase III Randomized Study Comparing a Chemotherapy with Cisplatin and Etoposide to a Etoposide Regimen without Cisplatin for Patients with Extensive Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Thierry Berghmans; Arnaud Scherpereel; Anne-Pascale Meert; Vicente Giner; Jacques Lecomte; Jean-Jacques Lafitte; Nathalie Leclercq; Marianne Paesmans; Jean-Paul Sculier
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Quantitative Benefit-Risk Assessment: State of the Practice Within Industry.

Authors:  Meredith Y Smith; Janine van Til; Rachael L DiSantostefano; A Brett Hauber; Kevin Marsh
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 1.778

10.  Comparative Efficacy of Systemic Agents for Brain Metastases From Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With an EGFR Mutation/ALK Rearrangement: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shervin Taslimi; Karanbir Brar; Yosef Ellenbogen; Jiawen Deng; Winston Hou; Fabio Y Moraes; Michael Glantz; Brad E Zacharia; Aaron Tan; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Mustafa Khasraw; Gelareh Zadeh; Alireza Mansouri
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.