Literature DB >> 8104211

Effect of polyurethane catheters and bacterial biofilms on the in-vitro activity of antimicrobials against Staphylococcus epidermidis.

A Pascual1, E Ramirez de Arellano, L Martínez Martínez, E J Perea.   

Abstract

The effect of two polyurethane ['Cavafix Certo' (CAV); 'Viacath' (VIA)] catheters on the in-vitro activity of amikacin (AN), clindamycin (CM), cloxacillin (CX), ciprofloxacin (CIP), vancomycin (VA), teicoplanin (TEI) and daptomycin (DAP) against slime producing and non-producing Staphylococcus epidermidis strains was determined using a microdilution assay. None of the antimicrobial agents was significantly affected in the presence of the catheters. The susceptibility of S. epidermidis attached to CAV and VIA catheters was also evaluated. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were similar when planktonic and attached bacteria were compared. Minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) markedly increased in the presence of 6 and 48 h bacterial biofilms. These increases in MBC values occurred when either slime producing or non-producing strains were used, and in most cases were higher for CAV catheters than for VIA catheters. This phenomenon was shown not to be due to differences in bacterial adherence. It is concluded that the in-vitro bactericidal activity of certain antimicrobials markedly decreased when bacteria adhered to plastic catheters, but this effect could have been dependent partially on the nature of the catheters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8104211     DOI: 10.1016/0195-6701(93)90050-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  9 in total

1.  Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  Leonard A Mermel; Michael Allon; Emilio Bouza; Donald E Craven; Patricia Flynn; Naomi P O'Grady; Issam I Raad; Bart J A Rijnders; Robert J Sherertz; David K Warren
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Comparison of recalcitrance to ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin exhibited by Pseudomonas aeruginosa bofilms displaying rapid-transport characteristics.

Authors:  J D Vrany; P S Stewart; P A Suci
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Comparative in vitro efficacies of various catheter lock solutions.

Authors:  Robert J Sherertz; Michael S Boger; Casey A Collins; Lori Mason; Issam I Raad
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Activity of glycopeptides in combination with amikacin or rifampin against Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms on plastic catheters.

Authors:  A Pascual; E Ramirez de Arellano; E J Perea
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 5.  Teicoplanin. A reappraisal of its antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  R N Brogden; D H Peters
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Clinical outcomes of antimicrobial lock solutions used in a treatment modality: a retrospective case series analysis.

Authors:  P Brandon Bookstaver; Katherine R Gerrald; Robert R Moran
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-06-17

Review 7.  Antimicrobial Locks in Patients Receiving Home Parenteral Nutrition.

Authors:  Dane Christina Daoud; Geert Wanten; Francisca Joly
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Biofilm reduction potential of 0.02% polyhexanide irrigation solution in several types of urethral catheters.

Authors:  Florian H H Brill; Julia Hambach; Christian Utpatel; Diana C Mogrovejo; Henrik Gabriel; Jan-Hendrik Klock; Joerg Steinmann; Andreas Arndt
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.264

9.  The hydrophobicity and roughness of a nasoenteral tube surface influences the adhesion of a multi-drug resistant strain of Staphylococcus Aureus.

Authors:  J C Lima; N J Andrade; N F F Soares; S O Ferreira; P E Fernandes; C C P Carvalho; J P Lopes; J F L Martins
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 2.476

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.