Literature DB >> 8102012

Clinical toxicities encountered with paclitaxel (Taxol).

E K Rowinsky1, E A Eisenhauer, V Chaudhry, S G Arbuck, R C Donehower.   

Abstract

Although paclitaxel (TAXOL) appears to be one of the most promising antineoplastic agents of the last decade, with demonstrated activity in advanced and refractory ovarian, breast, lung, and head and neck cancers, most clinical oncologists have had little experience with the agent. This is largely the result of the initially limited supply of paclitaxel and other obstacles encountered during early clinical development that restricted the drug's availability to a few investigational centers. Although a high incidence of major hypersensitivity reactions due to the Cremophor EL vehicle used in formulation disrupted and almost terminated the clinical development of paclitaxel, hypersensitivity reactions are no longer a serious problem consequent to the advent of effective premedication regimens and longer administration schemes. Instead, neutropenia is the principal toxicity of paclitaxel. At clinically relevant doses, absolute neutrophil count nadirs are severely depressed in most patients. The duration of severe neutropenia, however, is usually brief; treatment delays for unresolved hematologic toxicity are rare, and absolute neutrophil count nadirs are constant with repetitive dosing, suggesting that neutropenia is not cumulative. Asymptomatic sinus bradycardia has occurred in up to 29% of patients in phase II trials, and other cardiac disturbances, including atrioventricular conduction and bundle branch blocks, ventricular tachycardia, and possible ischemic manifestations, have been reported in approximately 3% of patients. Cardiac disturbances have primarily been noted in studies that used cardiac monitoring to more effectively detect and manage major hypersensitivity reactions. Although sinus bradycardia and conduction blocks appear to represent true toxicities, ventricular tachycardia and ischemic manifestations, which have largely been observed in patients with preexisting cardiac disease, may not be due to paclitaxel. In view of the lack of clinical significance of the cardiac effects and their infrequent occurrence, cardiac monitoring during paclitaxel is not recommended for patients without cardiac risk factors. However, until precise risk factors can be defined, patients with a significant antecedent cardiac history are generally not considered to be good candidates for paclitaxel therapy. Neurotoxicity, characterized principally by peripheral neurosensory manifestations, has generally been of mild to moderate severity, even in heavily pretreated patients at paclitaxel doses < or = 200 mg/m2. However, some patients have developed a severe sensory-motor polyneuropathy at higher doses of paclitaxel (given as a single agent or in combination with cisplatin). Patients with an antecedent peripheral neuropathy or coexisting medical illnesses associated with peripheral neuropathy (such as diabetes mellitus and substantial prior alcohol use) appear to be especially prone to developing peripheral neuropathy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8102012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol        ISSN: 0093-7754            Impact factor:   4.929


  175 in total

Review 1.  Drug therapy for gynaecological cancer in older women.

Authors:  R E van Rijswijk; J B Vermorken
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Phase I study of paclitaxel on a 3-hour schedule followed by carboplatin in untreated patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  E K Rowinsky; W A Flood; S E Sartorius; K M Bowling; D S Ettinger
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Phase I clinical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of KOS-862 (Epothilone D) in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphoma.

Authors:  Jason Konner; Rachel N Grisham; Jae Park; Owen A O'Connor; Gillian Cropp; Robert Johnson; Alison L Hannah; Martee L Hensley; Paul Sabbatini; Svetlana Mironov; Svetlana Miranov; Samuel Danishefsky; David Hyman; David R Spriggs; Jakob Dupont; Carol Aghajanian
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  The synthesis, discovery, and development of a highly promising class of microtubule stabilization agents: curative effects of desoxyepothilones B and F against human tumor xenografts in nude mice.

Authors:  T C Chou; O A O'Connor; W P Tong; Y Guan; Z G Zhang; S J Stachel; C Lee; S J Danishefsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cardiotoxicities of paclitaxel in African Americans.

Authors:  Padma Kamineni; Kalpana Prakasa; Syed P Hasan; Akula Ravi; Fitzroy Dawkins
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 6.  Nanoparticle delivery systems for cancer therapy: advances in clinical and preclinical research.

Authors:  Susana Patricia Egusquiaguirre; Manuela Igartua; Rosa María Hernández; José Luis Pedraz
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 7.  Inflammation and cancer-related fatigue: mechanisms, contributing factors, and treatment implications.

Authors:  Julienne E Bower; Donald M Lamkin
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 7.217

8.  Identification of high-risk drugs related to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-sponsored phase I trials.

Authors:  Shun Kishimoto; Nobu Oshima; Matthew Rinker; Murali C Krishna; Naoko Takebe
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 9.  Nano-enabled delivery of diverse payloads across complex biological barriers.

Authors:  Kathleen A Ross; Timothy M Brenza; Andrea M Binnebose; Yashdeep Phanse; Anumantha G Kanthasamy; Howard E Gendelman; Aliasger K Salem; Lyric C Bartholomay; Bryan H Bellaire; Balaji Narasimhan
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 10.  Mind the gap: a survey of how cancer drug carriers are susceptible to the gap between research and practice.

Authors:  Darren Lars Stirland; Joseph W Nichols; Seiji Miura; You Han Bae
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 9.776

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.