Literature DB >> 8099311

Enhancement of peroxisomal enzymes, cytochrome P-452 and DNA synthesis in putative preneoplastic foci of rat liver treated with the peroxisome proliferator nafenopin.

B Grasl-Kraupp1, W Huber, W Just, G Gibson, R Schulte-Hermann.   

Abstract

The peroxisome proliferator (PP) nafenopin (NAF) enhanced tumor development in rat liver through promotion of a subtype of putative preneoplastic cell foci, characterized by weak cytoplasmic basophilia. In order to elucidate the selective growth advantage of these weakly basophilic foci (WBF) we investigated the effects of NAF on their metabolic phenotype and DNA synthesis. In WBF, as well as in other foci subpopulations and in hepatocellular carcinomas the occurrence of five NAF-inducible enzymes, i.e. of peroxisomal beta-oxidation (acyl-CoA oxidase, bifunctional protein and thiolase), catalase and cytochrome P-452 was studied by immunohistochemical methods. In untreated livers almost all foci were stained with the same intensity as the surrounding tissue. When NAF was applied, most of the liver foci showed considerably less staining than the non-focal parenchyma in which pronounced enzyme induction had occurred. However, the subpopulation of WBF showed a more heterogeneous pattern of enzyme expression varying from less to even more than in the adjacent tissue. A similarly broad range of expression of peroxisomal enzymes was found in hepatocellular carcinomas. On average, however, the tumors exhibited less staining and lower activity of peroxisomal beta-oxidation than the surrounding parenchyma. WBF always showed higher rates of DNA synthesis than other foci subtypes and unaltered liver. In approximately one-third of these foci DNA synthesis was found to be enhanced concomitantly with elevated expression of peroxisomal beta-oxidation enzymes. In conclusion, WBF may have a selective growth advantage as they 'overrespond' to the inducing effects of NAF on DNA synthesis and peroxisomal enzymes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8099311     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/14.5.1007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  4 in total

Review 1.  Modes of action and species-specific effects of di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in the liver.

Authors:  Ivan Rusyn; Jeffrey M Peters; Michael L Cunningham
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.635

2.  The importance of tissue fixation for light microscopic immunohistochemical localization of peroxisomal proteins: the superiority of Carnoy's fixative over Baker's formalin and Bouin's solution.

Authors:  T Lehmann; A Völkl; H D Fahimi
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.304

3.  Liver gene expression profiles of rats treated with clofibric acid: comparison of whole liver and laser capture microdissected liver.

Authors:  Cécile Michel; Chantal Desdouets; Béatrice Sacre-Salem; Jean-Charles Gautier; Ruth Roberts; Eric Boitier
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 4.  The PPARα-dependent rodent liver tumor response is not relevant to humans: addressing misconceptions.

Authors:  J Christopher Corton; Jeffrey M Peters; James E Klaunig
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 5.153

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.