Literature DB >> 8094293

Differential cytotoxicity of 19 anticancer agents in wild type and etoposide resistant small cell lung cancer cell lines.

P B Jensen1, I J Christensen, M Sehested, H H Hansen, L Vindeløv.   

Abstract

A panel of six 'wild type' and three VP-16 resistant small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cell lines is used to evaluate to what extent in vitro sensitivity testing using a clonogenic assay can contribute to combine cytotoxic drugs to regimens with improved efficacy against SCLC. The resistant lines include (a) H69/DAU4, which is classical multidrug resistant (MDR) with a P-glycoprotein efflux pump (b) NYH/VM, which exhibits an altered topoisomerase II (topo II) activity and (c) H69/VP, which is cross-resistant to vincristine, exhibits a reduced drug accumulation as H69/DAU4 but is without P-glycoprotein. 19 anticancer agents were compared in the panel. The MDR lines demonstrated, as expected, cross-resistance to all topo II drugs, but also different patterns of collateral sensitivity to BCNU, cisplatin, ara-C, hydroxyurea, and to the topo I inhibitor camptothecin. The complete panel of nine cell lines clearly demonstrated diverse sensitivity patterns to drugs with different modes of action. Correlation analysis showed high correlation coefficients (CC) among drug analogues (e.g. VP-16/VM-26 0.99, vincristine/vindesine 0.89), and between drugs with similar mechanisms of action (e.g. BCNU/Cisplatin 0.89, VP-16/Doxorubicin 0.92), whereas different drug classes demonstrated low or even negative CC (e.g. BCNU/VP-16 -0.21). When the CC of the 19 drug patterns to VP-16 were plotted against the CC to BCNU, clustering was observed between drugs acting on microtubules, on topo II, alkylating agents, and antimetabolites. In this plot, camptothecin and ara-C patterns were promising by virtue of their lack of cross-resistance to alkylating agents and topo II drugs. Thus, the differential cytotoxicity patterns on this panel of cells can (1) give information about drug mechanism of action, (2) enable the selection and combination of non-cross-resistant drugs, and (3) show where new drugs 'fit in' among established agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8094293      PMCID: PMC1968190          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1993.58

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  45 in total

Review 1.  Management of small-cell cancer of the lung.

Authors:  H H Hansen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-04-04       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Reduced variation in the clonogenic assay obtained by standardization of the cell culture conditions prior to drug testing on human small cell lung cancer cell lines.

Authors:  P B Jensen; H Roed; L Vindeløv; I J Christensen; H H Hansen
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Relationship of VP-16 to the classical multidrug resistance phenotype.

Authors:  M Sehested; E Friche; P B Jensen; E J Demant
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Comparison of in vitro anticancer-drug-screening data generated with a tetrazolium assay versus a protein assay against a diverse panel of human tumor cell lines.

Authors:  L V Rubinstein; R H Shoemaker; K D Paull; R M Simon; S Tosini; P Skehan; D A Scudiero; A Monks; M R Boyd
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1990-07-04       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Multidrug-resistant phenotype of disease-oriented panels of human tumor cell lines used for anticancer drug screening.

Authors:  L Wu; A M Smythe; S F Stinson; L A Mullendore; A Monks; D A Scudiero; K D Paull; A D Koutsoukos; L V Rubinstein; M R Boyd
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1992-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  In vitro response of human small-cell lung-cancer cell lines to chemotherapeutic drugs; no correlation with clinical data.

Authors:  E F Smit; E G de Vries; H Timmer-Bosscha; L F de Leij; J W Oosterhuis; R J Scheper; J J Weening; P E Postmus; N H Mulder
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1992-04-22       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Doxorubicin sensitivity pattern in a panel of small-cell lung-cancer cell lines: correlation to etoposide and vincristine sensitivity and inverse correlation to carmustine sensitivity.

Authors:  P B Jensen; H Roed; M Sehested; E J Demant; L Vindeløv; I J Christensen; H H Hansen
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 8.  The 1991 Merck Frosst Award. Multidrug resistance in small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  S P Cole
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.273

9.  Reduced DNA topoisomerase II activity and drug-induced DNA cleavage activity in an adriamycin-resistant human small cell lung carcinoma cell line.

Authors:  S de Jong; J G Zijlstra; E G de Vries; N H Mulder
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  In vitro evaluation of the potential of aclarubicin in the treatment of small cell carcinoma of the lung (SCCL).

Authors:  P B Jensen; L Vindeløv; H Roed; E J Demant; M Sehested; T Skovsgaard; H H Hansen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Human cell lines as models for multidrug resistance in solid tumours.

Authors:  M Clynes; M Heenan; K Hall
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Target enzyme mutations are the molecular basis for resistance towards pharmacological inhibition of nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase.

Authors:  Uffe H Olesen; Jakob G Petersen; Antje Garten; Wieland Kiess; Jun Yoshino; Shin-Ichiro Imai; Mette K Christensen; Peter Fristrup; Annemette V Thougaard; Fredrik Björkling; Peter B Jensen; Søren J Nielsen; Maxwell Sehested
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  In vitro cross-resistance and collateral sensitivity in seven resistant small-cell lung cancer cell lines: preclinical identification of suitable drug partners to taxotere, taxol, topotecan and gemcitabin.

Authors:  P B Jensen; B Holm; M Sorensen; I J Christensen; M Sehested
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  TIMP-1 gene deficiency increases tumour cell sensitivity to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis.

Authors:  M L Davidsen; S Ø Würtz; M U Rømer; N M Sørensen; S K Johansen; I J Christensen; J K Larsen; H Offenberg; N Brünner; U Lademann
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  Targeting the Achilles heel of multidrug-resistant cancer by exploiting the fitness cost of resistance.

Authors:  Gergely Szakács; Matthew D Hall; Michael M Gottesman; Ahcène Boumendjel; Remy Kachadourian; Brian J Day; Hélène Baubichon-Cortay; Attilio Di Pietro
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  P-glycoprotein attenuates DNA repair activity in multidrug-resistant cells by acting through the Cbp-Csk-Src cascade.

Authors:  Li-Fang Lin; Ming-Hsi Wu; Vijaya Kumar Pidugu; I-Ching Ho; Tsann-Long Su; Te-Chang Lee
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-11

7.  Investigation of anti-cancer and migrastatic properties of novel curcumin derivatives on breast and ovarian cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Jinsha Koroth; Snehal Nirgude; Shweta Tiwari; Vidya Gopalakrishnan; Raghunandan Mahadeva; Sujeet Kumar; Subhas S Karki; Bibha Choudhary
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.659

8.  An etoposide-resistant lung cancer subline overexpresses the multidrug resistance-associated protein.

Authors:  L A Doyle; D D Ross; J V Ordonez; W Yang; Y Gao; Y Tong; C P Belani; J C Gutheil
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.