Literature DB >> 1360876

Doxorubicin sensitivity pattern in a panel of small-cell lung-cancer cell lines: correlation to etoposide and vincristine sensitivity and inverse correlation to carmustine sensitivity.

P B Jensen1, H Roed, M Sehested, E J Demant, L Vindeløv, I J Christensen, H H Hansen.   

Abstract

The aim of our investigations is to evaluate whether the sensitivity patterns of small-cell lung-cancer (SCLC) cell lines in vitro can be used in evaluating new drugs and in selecting drugs for the optimization of combination therapy. In our attempts to obtain a panel of cell lines demonstrating differential patterns in sensitivity, we have developed three SCLC lines exhibiting different types of multidrug resistance (MDR). In the present investigations we compared the sensitivity patterns shown by five wild-type SCLC lines and three MDR lines in response to six different types of drugs: doxorubicin, cytarabine, carmustine, cisplatin, vincristine, and etoposide. In the wild-type SCLC cell lines, the range of variation in sensitivity to all drugs was within a factor of 10. Cell lines showing low sensitivity to doxorubicin also exhibited low sensitivity to etoposide and vincristine, and vice versa. In contrast, the pattern of sensitivity to carmustine was almost the opposite of that to doxorubicin. A tendency to an inverse relationship between doxorubicin and carmustine sensitivity was also observed when doxorubicin sensitivity was reduced in near stationary cells and in cells exposed to the metabolic inhibitor 2-deoxy-D-glucose. In agreement with the pattern observed for the wild-type lines, all of the MDR sublines demonstrated collateral sensitivity to carmustine. As to cytarabine, the wild-type lines expressed a sensitivity pattern similar to that shown in response to doxorubicin. Interestingly, the opposite pattern was found in the MDR lines, as all three demonstrated cytarabine hypersensitivity. The combination of alkylating agents and "MDR" drugs are of proven clinical benefit in the treatment of solid tumors, as is the combination of anthracycline and cytarabine in acute myeloid leukemia. The experimentally derived sensitivity data on cytarabine, alkylating agents, and MDR drugs (i.e., etoposide, doxorubicin, vincristine) thus resemble the clinical experience with these drugs, and we conclude that the use of a clonogenic assay on the described panel of SCLC cell lines can give valuable information for the selection of agents for combination therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1360876     DOI: 10.1007/bf00695993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  32 in total

Review 1.  The influence of information on drug resistance on protocol design.

Authors:  V T DeVita
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Development of resistance to adriamycin (NSC-123127) in Ehrlich ascites tumor in vivo.

Authors:  K Danø
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1972-06

3.  In vitro evaluation of a new nitrosourea, TCNU, against human small cell lung cancer cell lines.

Authors:  H Roed; L L Vindeløv; M Spang-Thomsen; I J Christensen; H H Hansen
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  The cytotoxic activity of cisplatin, carboplatin and teniposide alone and combined determined on four human small cell lung cancer cell lines by the clonogenic assay.

Authors:  H Roed; L L Vindeløv; I J Christensen; M Spang-Thomsen; H H Hansen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1988-02

5.  Altered catalytic activity of and DNA cleavage by DNA topoisomerase II from human leukemic cells selected for resistance to VM-26.

Authors:  M K Danks; C A Schmidt; M C Cirtain; D P Suttle; W T Beck
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1988-11-29       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Development and cross-resistance characteristics of a subline of P388 leukemia resistant to 4'-(9-acridinylamino)-methanesulfon-m-anisidide.

Authors:  R K Johnson; W S Howard
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1982-05

7.  Genetic, biochemical, and cross-resistance studies with mutants of Chinese hamster ovary cells resistant to the anticancer drugs, VM-26 and VP16-213.

Authors:  R S Gupta
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Identification of the multidrug resistance-related membrane glycoprotein as an acceptor for calcium channel blockers.

Authors:  A R Safa; C J Glover; J L Sewell; M B Meyers; J L Biedler; R L Felsted
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1987-06-05       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Cisplatin and etoposide combination chemotherapy for refractory small cell carcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  L L Porter; D H Johnson; J D Hainsworth; K R Hande; F A Greco
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985-05

10.  Differential drug sensitivity conferred by growth status detected in a mixed population of cycling and noncycling cells.

Authors:  M H Barcellos-Hoff; L J Marton; D F Deen
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Inhibition of the multidrug resistance P-glycoprotein: time for a change of strategy?

Authors:  Richard Callaghan; Frederick Luk; Mary Bebawy
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.922

2.  In vitro cross-resistance and collateral sensitivity in seven resistant small-cell lung cancer cell lines: preclinical identification of suitable drug partners to taxotere, taxol, topotecan and gemcitabin.

Authors:  P B Jensen; B Holm; M Sorensen; I J Christensen; M Sehested
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Differential cytotoxicity of 19 anticancer agents in wild type and etoposide resistant small cell lung cancer cell lines.

Authors:  P B Jensen; I J Christensen; M Sehested; H H Hansen; L Vindeløv
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 7.640

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.