Literature DB >> 8093367

Cathepsin D expression detected by immunohistochemistry has independent prognostic value in axillary node-negative breast cancer.

J Isola1, S Weitz, T Visakorpi, K Holli, R Shea, N Khabbaz, O P Kallioniemi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Increased expression of the lysosomal protease cathepsin D (CD) has been implicated in the metastatic progression of breast cancer. This study was designed to determine the prognostic significance of CD expression in axillary node-negative (ANN) breast cancer. The relationship of CD expression and onset of soft tissue recurrences and visceral metastatases was also studied. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed a population-based group of 262 ANN breast cancer patients, none of whom had received any adjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy. An immunohistochemical method based on a new monoclonal antibody (1C11) with a distinct epitope specificity made it possible to study CD expression from archival paraffin-embedded specimens and to distinguish staining in tumor cells from the high-level expression found in tumor-infiltrating macrophages.
RESULTS: High-level CD expression, as defined by cytoplasmic immunoreactivity in greater than 10% of the cancer cells, was found in 95 cases (36%). High-level CD expression was associated with large primary tumor size (P = .014), but not with histologic grade, estrogen and progesterone receptors, DNA index, or S-phase fraction, or with c-erbB-2 and p53 overexpression. Patients with CD-positive tumors developed significantly more often both soft tissue recurrences and visceral metastases (P = .0007) and had a significantly shorter disease-free survival (P < .0001). Eight-year overall survival of patients with high-level CD expression was 64% as compared with 90% in those with low-level expression (relative risk, 2.97; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 1.6 to 4.4; P < .0001). According to a Cox multivariate model and a regression-tree analysis, high-level CD expression was an independent predictor of poor overall survival in conjunction with tumor size and S-phase fraction.
CONCLUSION: These results indicate that CD expression determined by immunohistochemistry is a powerful prognostic factor in ANN breast cancer. The most significant prognostic information was obtained when CD expression (predicting metastatic activity) was combined with estimate of cell-proliferation rate (S-phase fraction).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8093367     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.1.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  27 in total

1.  Expressions of chromogranin A and cathepsin D in human primary hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Huang; Chun-Mei Wang; Xiao-Wen Dai; Zhen- Jiang Li; Bo-Rong Pan; Li-Bin Yu; Bin Qian; Li Fang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Prognostic factors in node-negative breast cancer: a review of studies with sample size more than 200 and follow-up more than 5 years.

Authors:  Attiqa N Mirza; Nadeem Q Mirza; Georges Vlastos; S Eva Singletary
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Cathepsin D detected by automated and quantitative immunohistochemistry in breast carcinomas: correlation with overall and disease free survival.

Authors:  C Charpin; S Garcia; C Bouvier; F Martini; M Lavaut; C Allasia; P Bonnier; L Andrac
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Evaluation of the prognostic significance of nm23/NDP kinase and cathepsin D in anal carcinomas. An immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  R Holm; G Tanum
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  Immunohistochemical detection of nm23/NDP kinase and cathepsin D in medullary carcinomas of the thyroid gland.

Authors:  R Holm; J Høie; O Kaalhus; J M Nesland
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Response to P.M. Ravdin (BCRT 24:219-226, 1993), "Evaluation of Cathepsin D as a Prognostic Factor in Breast Cancer".

Authors:  H Rochefort; S Thorpe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Cellular localisation by in situ hybridisation of cathepsin D, stromelysin 3, and urokinase plasminogen activator RNAs in breast cancer.

Authors:  C Escot; Y Zhao; C Puech; H Rochefort
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Prognostic evaluation of oestrogen-regulated protein immunoreactivity in ductal invasive (NOS) breast cancer.

Authors:  L Nakopoulou; A C Lazaris; D Baltas; I Giannopoulou; N Kavantzas; A Tzonou
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Reevaluating cathepsin D as a biomarker for breast cancer: serum activity levels versus histopathology.

Authors:  Daniel E Abbott; Naira V Margaryan; Jacqueline S Jeruss; Seema Khan; Virginia Kaklamani; David J Winchester; Nora Hansen; Alfred Rademaker; Zhila Khalkhali-Ellis; Mary J C Hendrix
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 4.742

10.  A multiparametric study on the prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor in operable breast carcinoma.

Authors:  G Gasparini; P Boracchi; P Bevilacqua; M Mezzetti; F Pozza; N Weidner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.