Literature DB >> 8091040

Corrections for exposure measurement error in logistic regression models with an application to nutritional data.

J Kuha1.   

Abstract

Two correction methods are considered for multiple logistic regression models with some covariates measured with error. Both methods are based on approximating the complicated regression model between the response and the observed covariates with simpler models. The first model is the logistic approximation proposed by Rosner et al., and the second is a second-order extension of this model. Only the mean and covariance matrix of the true values of the covariates given the observed values have to be specified, but no distributional assumptions about the measurement error are made. The parameters related to the conditional moments are estimated from a separate validation data set. The correction methods considered here are compared to other methods proposed in the literature. They are also applied to a multiple logistic model describing the effect of nutrient intakes on the ratio of serum HDL cholesterol. The data constitute baseline data from an epidemiological cohort study, in which a separate pilot study has been carried out to obtain validation information. In the example the corrected parameter estimates from the two approximate models are very similar. Both differ considerably from the naive logistic estimates, indicating a large effect of the measurement error. The various assumptions required by the correction methods are also discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8091040     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780131105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  20 in total

1.  There is no impact of exposure measurement error on latency estimation in linear models.

Authors:  S B Peskoe; D Spiegelman; M Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Approximate and Pseudo-Likelihood Analysis for Logistic Regression Using External Validation Data to Model Log Exposure.

Authors:  Robert H Lyles; Lawrence L Kupper
Journal:  J Agric Biol Environ Stat       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 1.524

3.  Flexible dose-response models for Japanese atomic bomb survivor data: Bayesian estimation and prediction of cancer risk.

Authors:  James Bennett; Mark P Little; Sylvia Richardson
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Performance of propensity score calibration--a simulation study.

Authors:  Til Stürmer; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Kenneth J Rothman; Jerry Avorn; Robert J Glynn
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  The impact of gene-environment dependence and misclassification in genetic association studies incorporating gene-environment interactions.

Authors:  Sara Lindström; Yu-Chun Yen; Donna Spiegelman; Peter Kraft
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 0.444

6.  Design and analysis considerations for combining data from multiple biomarker studies.

Authors:  Abigail Sloan; Yue Song; Mitchell H Gail; Rebecca Betensky; Bernard Rosner; Regina G Ziegler; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Molin Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Correlated biomarker measurement error: an important threat to inference in environmental epidemiology.

Authors:  A Z Pollack; N J Perkins; S L Mumford; A Ye; E F Schisterman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Regression calibration with heteroscedastic error variance.

Authors:  Donna Spiegelman; Roger Logan; Douglas Grove
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 0.968

Review 9.  Dairy products and pancreatic cancer risk: a pooled analysis of 14 cohort studies.

Authors:  J M Genkinger; M Wang; R Li; D Albanes; K E Anderson; L Bernstein; P A van den Brandt; D R English; J L Freudenheim; C S Fuchs; S M Gapstur; G G Giles; R A Goldbohm; N Håkansson; P L Horn-Ross; A Koushik; J R Marshall; M L McCullough; A B Miller; K Robien; T E Rohan; C Schairer; D T Silverman; R Z Stolzenberg-Solomon; J Virtamo; W C Willett; A Wolk; R G Ziegler; S A Smith-Warner
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Survival analysis with functions of mismeasured covariate histories: the case of chronic air pollution exposure in relation to mortality in the nurses' health study.

Authors:  Xiaomei Liao; Xin Zhou; Molin Wang; Jaime E Hart; Francine Laden; Donna Spiegelman
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 1.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.