Literature DB >> 8090841

Use of electrical stimulation to enhance recovery of quadriceps femoris muscle force production in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

L Snyder-Mackler1, A Delitto, S W Stralka, S L Bailey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Electrical stimulation has been shown to be effective in aiding the recovery of quadriceps femoris muscle force production after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The actual dosage of stimulation (training intensity) has not been well described. The purpose of this investigation was to establish a dose-response curve for electrical stimulation regimens designed to improve quadriceps femoris muscle recovery in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from a subsample (n = 52) of patients receiving electrical stimulation (N = 110) who were involved in a large, multicenter randomized clinical trial investigating treatment strategies designed to enhance quadriceps femoris muscle recovery. Fifty-two subjects (40 male, 12 female), with an age range of 15 to 43 years (mean = 25, SD = 7), participated in 4 weeks of quadriceps femoris muscle training using either portable, battery-powered home stimulators or console stimulators designed for clinical use. Training intensities were monitored by logging the electrically elicited knee extension torque and expressing this torque as a percentage of the uninvolved quadriceps femoris muscles' maximal voluntary contraction force. After the 4 weeks of training, isometric muscle torque was assessed and a dose-response curve was generated. The relationship between training intensity and quadriceps femoris muscle torque was assessed with Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficients.
RESULTS: A significant, linear correlation was found between training intensity and quadriceps femoris muscle torque. Subjects training with console, clinical generators trained at higher intensities than those training with portable, battery-operated generators; such training resulted in higher quadriceps femoris muscle torque. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: These results support the use of high-intensity electrical stimulation and do not support the use of low-intensity or battery-powered stimulators when the goal is recovery of quadriceps femoris muscle force production in the early phases of rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. [Snyder-Mackler L, Delitto A, Stralka SW, Bailey SL. Use of electrical stimulation to enhance recovery of quadriceps femoris muscle force production in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8090841     DOI: 10.1093/ptj/74.10.901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  64 in total

1.  Current concepts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a criterion-based rehabilitation progression.

Authors:  Douglas Adams; David S Logerstedt; Airelle Hunter-Giordano; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 2.  Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Muscle oxygenation of vastus lateralis and medialis muscles during alternating and pulsed current electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Abdulaziz Aldayel; Makii Muthalib; Marc Jubeau; Michael McGuigan; Kazunori Nosaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Effect of training with neuromuscular electrical stimulation on elbow flexion strength.

Authors:  William R Holcomb
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Contribution of Neuromuscular Factors to Quadriceps Asymmetry After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Alexa K Johnson; Riann M Palmieri-Smith; Lindsey K Lepley
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation: influence of electrode positioning and stimulus amplitude settings on muscle response.

Authors:  M Gobbo; P Gaffurini; L Bissolotti; F Esposito; C Orizio
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Motor unit recruitment during neuromuscular electrical stimulation: a critical appraisal.

Authors:  C Scott Bickel; Chris M Gregory; Jesse C Dean
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Stabilization exercises combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation for patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Muhammad Alrwaily; Michael Schneider; Gwendolyn Sowa; Michael Timko; Susan L Whitney; Anthony Delitto
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 9.  Combined application of neuromuscular electrical stimulation and voluntary muscular contractions.

Authors:  Thierry Paillard
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  The role of pulse duration and stimulation duration in maximizing the normalized torque during neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Ashraf S Gorgey; Gary A Dudley
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.751

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.