Literature DB >> 809049

Fresh explant culture of human tumours in vitro and the assessment of sensitivity to cytotoxic chemotherapy.

R J Berry, A H Laing, J Wells.   

Abstract

Ninety-seven fresh explants of human tumours have been cultured in vitro in an attempt to predict their sensitivity to subsequent cytotoxic chemotherapy. Only 3/26 solid ovarian tumours were cultured successfully although 12 of the 23 which failed to grow proved later to have benign histology. Of 10 solid tumours from other sites, only 2/4 renal tumours and one melanoma were successfully grown and tested in vitro. A higher success rate was achieved in culturing carcinoma cells of ovarian (10/22) and breast (10/22) origin from ascitic and pleural fluids. Using increase in cell number after 7 days' growth in vitro as the biological end-point, concentrations of cytotoxic drugs which are achievable in patients produced significant effects on some tumour explants. Detailed studies of serial subcultures in vitro from an ovarian tumour showed that large changes in chemosensitivity occur within about 2 passages, in vitro, so that sensitivity testing can only be carried out using fresh explants or their first subcultures if any possible correlation between in vitro cytotoxicity and in situ response is to be studied. Clinical effectiveness and in vitro chemosensitivity are compared for a limited number of patients with ovarian and breast carcinomata for whom follow-up information was available; no useful correlation was found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 809049      PMCID: PMC2009389          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1975.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  6 in total

1.  Investigation of the relation between clinical and tissue-culture response to chemotherapeutic agents on human cancer.

Authors:  J C WRIGHT; J P COBB; S L GUMPORT; F M GOLOMB; D SAFADI
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1957-12-19       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Biochemical approaches to prediction of response in solid tumors.

Authors:  W H Wolberg
Journal:  Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1971-12

3.  Tissue-culture microtest for predicting response of human cancer to chemotherapy.

Authors:  H L Holmes; J M Little
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-10-26       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Testing anti-cancer drugs.

Authors:  J S Mitchell; P P Dendy; M P Dawson; T K Wheeler
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1972-04-29       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Chemotherapy of a spontaneous mammary carcinoma in mice: relation between in vitro-in vivo activity and blood and tumor concentrations of serveral antitumor drugs.

Authors:  G Balconi; A Bossi; M G Donelli; S Filippeschi; G Franchi; L Morasca; S Garattini
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1973-04

6.  Chemotherapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  H G Limburg
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1969-04
  6 in total
  10 in total

1.  Suppression of in vitro peripheral blood lymphocyte mitogenesis by cytotoxic drugs commonly used in the treatment of breast cancer: a comparative study.

Authors:  M Gereis; A P Burford-Mason; S M Watkins
Journal:  Agents Actions       Date:  1987-12

2.  KRAS mutant tumor subpopulations can subvert durable responses to personalized cancer treatments.

Authors:  Barbara L Parsons; Meagan B Myers
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Ex vivo hemodialysis culture system for assessing the activity of cancer chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  J M Quarles; N G Morris; A Leibovitz
Journal:  In Vitro       Date:  1982-02

Review 4.  Role of laboratory chemosensitivity testing in the selection of cancer chemotherapy for individual patients.

Authors:  P J Selby; D Raghavan
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Prediction of response to cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  M F Sarosdy; D D Von Hoff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  British Association for Cancer Research 22nd Annual general meeting. 13-15 April 1981. Abstracts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  A comparison of three assays used for the in vitro chemosensitivity testing of human tumours.

Authors:  A P Wilson; C H Ford; C E Newman; A Howell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Variation in response of xenografts of colo-rectal carcinoma to chemotherapy.

Authors:  K Nowak; M J Peckham; G G Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  In vitro sensitivity of human ovarian tumours to chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  A P Wilson; F E Neal
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Assays of drug sensitivity for cells from human tumours: in vitro and in vivo tests on a xenografted tumour.

Authors:  A E Bateman; M J Peckham; G G Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.