Literature DB >> 7019254

Role of laboratory chemosensitivity testing in the selection of cancer chemotherapy for individual patients.

P J Selby, D Raghavan.   

Abstract

Recently several assays have been developed which allow the growth of colonies from cell suspensions prepared from human tumour biopsy specimens. It has been suggested that such assays will provide a reliable means of measuring the chemosensitivity of human tumours for predicting the response to treatment in patients. We have briefly reviewed the previous, largely unsuccessful, attempts at chemosensitivity testing and the potential place of the new assays. The measurement of the survival of clonogenic tumour cells after cytotoxic treatment probably reflects to some extent the survival of cells which in vivo are capable of proliferating to repopulate and regrow the tumour. This endpoint therefore has advantages over alternatives that do not directly measure reproductive cell death, and the assays also have the advantage of suppressing the growth of many non-malignant cells found in tumours. However, technical problems such as the preparation of cell suspensions and the artificial nature of the drug exposure phase of the assays have not been completely overcome and the plating efficiencies remain low in most systems. Work with model systems such as human tumour xenografts tends to support the usefulness of the assays but also highlights some difficulties. Clinical studies of chemosensitivity testing are in progress and initial results are encouraging but inconclusive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7019254      PMCID: PMC493324          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.34.5.455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  63 in total

1.  A direct measurement of the radiation sensitivity of normal mouse bone marrow cells.

Authors:  J E TILL; E A McCULLOCH
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1961-02       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  In vitro and in vivo radiosensitivity of human tumour cells obtained from a pancreatic carcinoma xenograft.

Authors:  V D Courtenay; I E Smith; M J Peckham; G G Steel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Chemotherapy of mouse myeloma: quantitative cell cultures predictive of response in vivo.

Authors:  M Ogawa; D E Bergsagel; E A McCulloch
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Colonial growth in agar of cells derived from neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissues of children.

Authors:  R M McAllister; G Reed
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 3.756

Review 5.  Proliferation-dependent cytotoxicity of anticancer agents: a review.

Authors:  F Valeriote; L van Putten
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Comparison of different methods of determining cell viability after exposure to cytotoxic compounds.

Authors:  B K Bhuyan; B E Loughman; T J Fraser; K J Day
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1976-02       Impact factor: 3.905

7.  The interpretation of marker protein assays: a critical appraisal in clinical studies and a xenograft model.

Authors:  D Raghavan; J Gibbs; R Nogueira Costa; J Kohn; A H Orr; A Barrett; M J Peckham
Journal:  Br J Cancer Suppl       Date:  1980-04

8.  Effects of dexamethasone and betamethasone on in vitro cultures from human astrocytoma.

Authors:  M Guner; R I Freshney; D Morgan; M G Freshney; D G Thomas; D I Graham
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  An in vitro colony assay for human tumours grown in immune-suppressed mice and treated in vivo with cytotoxic agents.

Authors:  V D Courtenay; J Mills
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  In vitro chemosensitivity tests on xenografted human melanomas.

Authors:  A E Bateman; P J Selby; G G Steel; G D Towse
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  6 in total

1.  The proliferation of human tumor cell lines in the presence of different agars, agaroses, and methyl cellulose.

Authors:  E J Pavlik; D E Kenady; J R Van Nagell; K Keaton; E S Donaldson; M B Hanson; R C Flanigan
Journal:  In Vitro       Date:  1983-07

Review 2.  Evolution of Chemosensitivity and Resistance Assays as Predictors of Clinical Outcomes in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Bradley J Monk; Thomas J Herzog; Krishnansu S Tewari
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.116

Review 3.  Overview of a chemoresponse assay in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  E C Grendys; J V Fiorica; J W Orr; R Holloway; D Wang; C Tian; J K Chan; T J Herzog
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Limitations of the clonal agar assay for the assessment of primary human ovarian tumour biopsies.

Authors:  I Bertoncello; T R Bradley; J J Campbell; A J Day; I A McDonald; G R McLeish; M A Quinn; R Rome; G S Hodgson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Viability analysis and apoptosis induction of breast cancer cells in a microfluidic device: effect of cytostatic drugs.

Authors:  Job Komen; Floor Wolbers; Henk R Franke; Helene Andersson; Istvan Vermes; Albert van den Berg
Journal:  Biomed Microdevices       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.838

6.  Characterization of organoid cultured human breast cancer.

Authors:  Nadine Goldhammer; Jiyoung Kim; Vera Timmermans-Wielenga; Ole William Petersen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 6.466

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.