Literature DB >> 8088129

Emerging standards for diabetes care from a city-wide primary care audit.

I J Benett1, C Lambert, G Hinds, C Kirton.   

Abstract

Aggregated data from Manchester practices participating in the Diabetes 2000 project were used to develop peer group standards of mean performance and of excellence. The crude prevalence of known diabetes mellitus was 1.21% of which 20.2% had Type 1 diabetes. The aggregated mean of patients who had the following examinations performed in the preceding year were: glycated haemoglobin 56.8%; weight or body mass index 67.8%; foot pulses 37.3%; ankle reflexes 31.3%; proteinuria 60%; fundoscopy 48.2%; blood pressure 81.1%; serum cholesterol or lipids 34%. The percentage of patients referred to or seen by health care professionals in the preceding year were 14.4% to diabetes specialist nurses; 22.1% to opticians or ophthalmologists; 25% to chiropodists; and 21.5% to dietitians. The best performing practices examined 79% of patients fundi in the preceding year, 84% of their foot pulses, 74% of their ankle reflexes, and gave appropriate smoking advice in 65% of cases. These standards were fed back to the participating practices so that they could compare their own performance with that of the city-wide mean, and with the best performing practices. From these data practices have then been able to set themselves realistic targets for improved performance in the following year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8088129     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1994.tb00312.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  8 in total

1.  Estimation of the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes from primary care and secondary care source data: comparison of record linkage with capture-recapture analysis.

Authors:  J N Harvey; L Craney; D Kelly
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Impact of diabetic retinopathy screening on a British district population: case detection and blindness prevention in an evidence-based model.

Authors:  M O Bachmann; S J Nelson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Collation and comparison of multi-practice audit data: prevalence and treatment of known diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  K Khunti; E Goyder; R Baker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Features of primary care associated with variations in process and outcome of care of people with diabetes.

Authors:  K Khunti; S Ganguli; R Baker; A Lowy
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Sustained good glycaemic control in NIDDM patients by implementation of structured care in general practice: 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  J J de Sonnaville; M Bouma; L P Colly; W Devillé; D Wijkel; R J Heine
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Do clinical guidelines introduced with practice based education improve care of asthmatic and diabetic patients? A randomised controlled trial in general practices in east London.

Authors:  G Feder; C Griffiths; C Highton; S Eldridge; M Spence; L Southgate
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-12-02

7.  Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections of insulin: economic comparison in adult and adolescent type 1 diabetes mellitus in Australia.

Authors:  Neale Cohen; Michael E Minshall; Lyn Sharon-Nash; Katerina Zakrzewska; William J Valentine; Andrew J Palmer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  An estimation of the long-term clinical and economic benefits of insulin lispro in Type 1 diabetes in the UK.

Authors:  C Pratoomsoot; H T Smith; A Kalsekar; K S Boye; J Arellano; W J Valentine
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.359

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.