Literature DB >> 8087362

Spontaneous gasping during cardiopulmonary resuscitation without mechanical ventilation.

M Noc1, M H Weil, S Sun, W Tang, J Bisera.   

Abstract

Spontaneous gasping is frequently observed during cardiac arrest, especially when mechanical ventilation is withheld during precordial compression. We related spontaneous gasping to pulmonary gas exchange and cardiac resuscitability in a rodent model of cardiac arrest. Ventricular fibrillation was electrically induced in 15 Sprague-Dawley rats. After 4 min untreated ventricular fibrillation, precordial compression was initiated. Coronary perfusion pressure was maintained between 25 and 30 mm Hg. Oxygen was supplied at the tracheal tube port coincident with start of precordial compression in 10 animals. Five additional control animals were identically treated except they were mechanically ventilated coincident with start of precordial compression. After 6 min precordial compression, defibrillation was attempted and five of 10 nonventilated animals, and all control animals, were resuscitated by direct current countershock. In the successfully resuscitated, nonventilated animals, the frequency of spontaneous gasping during precordial compression progressively increased to an average of 19 gasps/min but it was < 6 gasps/min in nonresuscitated animals. More frequent gasping was associated with correspondingly greater arterial PO2 (110 versus 51 mm Hg, p < 0.01) and lesser PCO2 (55 versus 91 mm Hg, p < 0.01). In control animals, no spontaneous gasping was observed during precordial compression. Arterial PO2 and PCO2 of mechanically ventilated animals was more like that of spontaneously gasping rats. According, the frequency of spontaneous gasping in absence of mechanical ventilation is predictive of cardiac resuscitation success and associated with improved arterial oxygenation and CO2 removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8087362     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.3.8087362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  10 in total

1.  Respiratory events in infants presenting with apparent life threatening events: is there an explanation from esophageal motility?

Authors:  Kathryn A Hasenstab; Sudarshan R Jadcherla
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  A randomized trial of continuous versus interrupted chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: rationale for and design of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Continuous Chest Compressions Trial.

Authors:  Siobhan P Brown; Henry Wang; Tom P Aufderheide; Christian Vaillancourt; Robert H Schmicker; Sheldon Cheskes; Ron Straight; Peter Kudenchuk; Laurie Morrison; M Riccardo Colella; Joseph Condle; George Gamez; David Hostler; Tami Kayea; Sally Ragsdale; Shannon Stephens; Graham Nichol
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  A Rat Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Resuscitation by Conventional Closed-chest Technique.

Authors:  Lorissa Lamoureux; Jeejabai Radhakrishnan; Raúl J Gazmuri
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Continued breathing followed by gasping or apnea in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Mathias Zuercher; Gordon A Ewy; Ronald W Hilwig; Arthur B Sanders; Charles W Otto; Robert A Berg; Karl B Kern
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Gasping in response to basic resuscitation efforts: observation in a Swine model of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Mathias Zuercher; Gordon A Ewy; Charles W Otto; Ronald W Hilwig; Bentley J Bobrow; Lani Clark; Vatsal Chikani; Arthur B Sanders; Robert A Berg; Karl B Kern
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2010-05-31

6.  Comparison of continuous compression with regular ventilations versus 30:2 compressions-ventilations strategy during mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Zhengfei Yang; Qingyu Liu; Guanghui Zheng; Zhifeng Liu; Longyuan Jiang; Qing Lin; Rui Chen; Wanchun Tang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Chest Compression Synchronized Ventilation versus Intermitted Positive Pressure Ventilation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Pig Model.

Authors:  Clemens Kill; Monika Galbas; Christian Neuhaus; Oliver Hahn; Pascal Wallot; Karl Kesper; Hinnerk Wulf; Wolfgang Dersch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Four ways to ventilate during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model: a randomized study.

Authors:  Benedict Kjærgaard; Egidijus Bavarskis; Sigridur Olga Magnusdottir; Charlotte Runge; Daiva Erentaite; Jes Sefland Vogt; Mette Dahl Bendtsen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Circulation first - the time has come to question the sequencing of care in the ABCs of trauma; an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter trial.

Authors:  Paula Ferrada; Rachael A Callcut; David J Skarupa; Therese M Duane; Alberto Garcia; Kenji Inaba; Desmond Khor; Vincent Anto; Jason Sperry; David Turay; Rachel M Nygaard; Martin A Schreiber; Toby Enniss; Michelle McNutt; Herb Phelan; Kira Smith; Forrest O Moore; Irene Tabas; Joseph Dubose
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  An impedance threshold device did not improve carotid blood flow in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Benedict Kjaergaard; Hans O Holdgaard; Sigridur O Magnusdottir; Søren Lundbye-Christensen; Erika F Christensen
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 5.531

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.