Literature DB >> 8085437

Transcranial stimulation of the leg area of the motor cortex in humans.

Y Terao1, Y Ugawa, K Sakai, Y Uesaka, N Kohara, I Kanazawa.   

Abstract

We used transcranial magnetic stimulation on nine normal volunteers to establish an effective way to stimulate the leg area of the motor cortex. Three types of coils: a large figure-eight coil, small figure-eight coil, and a round coil were used. Surface electromyographic activities were recorded from the left tibialis anterior muscle, and the latencies and amplitudes compared with those obtained by anodal electrical stimulation. The most stable responses were obtained when the large figure-eight coil was centered over the vertex and backward current was run through it or when the round coil was centered two to three centimeters anterior to the vertex with left-flowing current in it at the posterior widening. The latencies obtained under these stimulation conditions were the same as those obtained by electrical stimulation. We conclude that direct activation of the pyramidal cells occurs in the leg area of the motor cortex in all forms of magnetic and electrical stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8085437     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1994.tb02650.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6314            Impact factor:   3.209


  15 in total

1.  Spinal cord-evoked potentials and muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation in 10 awake human subjects.

Authors:  D A Houlden; M L Schwartz; C H Tator; P Ashby; W A MacKay
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  High-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation of the supplementary motor area reduces bimanual coupling during anti-phase but not in-phase movements.

Authors:  Maarten Steyvers; Seiji Etoh; Dieter Sauner; Oron Levin; Hartwig R Siebner; Stephan P Swinnen; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The supplementary motor area contributes to the timing of the anticipatory postural adjustment during step initiation in participants with and without Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  J V Jacobs; J S Lou; J A Kraakevik; F B Horak
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Coil design considerations for deep transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Electric field depth-focality tradeoff in transcranial magnetic stimulation: simulation comparison of 50 coil designs.

Authors:  Zhi-De Deng; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 6.  Consensus: New methodologies for brain stimulation.

Authors:  Ying-Zu Huang; Martin Sommer; Gary Thickbroom; Masashi Hamada; Alvero Pascual-Leonne; Walter Paulus; Joseph Classen; Angel V Peterchev; Abraham Zangen; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Effect of conventional transcranial direct current stimulation devices and electrode sizes on motor cortical excitability of the quadriceps muscle.

Authors:  Adam Z Gardi; Amanda K Vogel; Aastha K Dharia; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 8.  The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to evaluate cortical excitability of lower limb musculature: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Trisha M Kesar; James W Stinear; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.406

9.  Impact of non-brain anatomy and coil orientation on inter- and intra-subject variability in TMS at midline.

Authors:  Erik G Lee; Priyam Rastogi; Ravi L Hadimani; David C Jiles; Joan A Camprodon
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Optimal coil orientation for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Lars Richter; Gunnar Neumann; Stephen Oung; Achim Schweikard; Peter Trillenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.