Literature DB >> 8084198

Modulation Detection Interference (MDI) in listeners with cochlear hearing loss.

J H Grose1, J W Hall.   

Abstract

This study compared Modulation Detection Interference (MDI) in listeners with cochlear hearing loss and in listeners with normal hearing. The study was motivated by questions of temporal resolution in the listeners with cochlear hearing loss as well as by their general difficulty in monitoring target sounds in the presence of competing background noise. The first experiment was similar to the MDI paradigm of Yost and Sheft (1989) and showed an equivalence in performance between the two groups of listeners: MDI brought about by an interfering tone comodulated with the target tone at 10 Hz was about 11 dB in both groups. There was also no difference in MDI magnitude when the modulation rate of the interferer changed to 25 Hz, indicating a lack of tuning to differential modulation rate in the gated paradigm employed here. The second experiment was analogous in concept to the measurement of a psychophysical tuning curve; the depth of modulation of the interfering carrier was adjusted to just interfere with the detection of a suprathreshold degree of modulation on the target carrier. The listeners with cochlear hearing loss performed quite similarly to the normal group, and the general lack of a frequency effect for the carrier tones suggested that MDI was relatively insensitive to presumed differences in auditory filter bandwidth between listeners. Because the basis of MDI has been hypothesized to be the fusion of the interfering tone with the target tone, the results of this study suggest that the auditory grouping factors presumed to underlie MDI are intact in listeners with hearing loss of cochlear origin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8084198     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3703.680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  5 in total

1.  Cochlear hearing loss and the detection of sinusoidal versus random amplitude modulation.

Authors:  John H Grose; Heather L Porter; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Influence of broad auditory tuning on across-frequency integration of speech patterns.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Kimberly A Carson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Across-frequency processing of modulation phase differences in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lentz; Susie Valentine
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Review article: review of the literature on temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment: a critical assessment of the role of suprathreshold deficits.

Authors:  Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Patrick M Zurek
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-12-11

5.  Differences in Auditory Perception Between Young and Older Adults When Controlling for Differences in Hearing Loss and Cognition.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lentz; Larry E Humes; Gary R Kidd
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.