PURPOSE: To evaluate, in a long-term follow-up study of consecutive patients (N = 99), the impact of surgery--breast-conserving treatment (BCT) versus mastectomy (MT)--on psychosocial adjustment among women with breast cancer, pTNM stage I/II. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted at a median of 6 years (range, 5.8 to 8.1) after primary surgery. Sixty-six women were available for the long-term follow-up study. Twenty-six women had been treated with BCT and 40 with MT. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups concerning psychosocial adjustment, as measured by the Social adjustment Scale (SAS). In general, the levels of maladjustment were lower than at 13 months postoperatively, but 10% still showed maladjustment. Sixty percent of the women were unwilling to show themselves naked, and 22% felt that they had become less attractive because of the surgical treatment. In an explorative part of the interview, 68% of the women complained about how they had been informed of the diagnosis. A tendency toward a significant difference was found in the relation between previous maladjustment and a negative experience at the time of diagnosis (P = .07). CONCLUSION: Few data are available on long-term follow-up results with regard to psychosocial adjustment among women after breast cancer surgery. This study provides the important information that there are no differences in patient psychosocial adjustment that can be ascribed to the type of surgery at 6-year follow-up evaluation.
PURPOSE: To evaluate, in a long-term follow-up study of consecutive patients (N = 99), the impact of surgery--breast-conserving treatment (BCT) versus mastectomy (MT)--on psychosocial adjustment among women with breast cancer, pTNM stage I/II. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted at a median of 6 years (range, 5.8 to 8.1) after primary surgery. Sixty-six women were available for the long-term follow-up study. Twenty-six women had been treated with BCT and 40 with MT. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups concerning psychosocial adjustment, as measured by the Social adjustment Scale (SAS). In general, the levels of maladjustment were lower than at 13 months postoperatively, but 10% still showed maladjustment. Sixty percent of the women were unwilling to show themselves naked, and 22% felt that they had become less attractive because of the surgical treatment. In an explorative part of the interview, 68% of the women complained about how they had been informed of the diagnosis. A tendency toward a significant difference was found in the relation between previous maladjustment and a negative experience at the time of diagnosis (P = .07). CONCLUSION: Few data are available on long-term follow-up results with regard to psychosocial adjustment among women after breast cancer surgery. This study provides the important information that there are no differences in patientpsychosocial adjustment that can be ascribed to the type of surgery at 6-year follow-up evaluation.
Authors: Joan R Bloom; Susan L Stewart; Carol N D'Onofrio; Judith Luce; Priscilla J Banks Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Neil J Farber; Susan Y Urban; Virginia U Collier; Joan Weiner; Ronald G Polite; Elizabeth B Davis; E Gil Boyer Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Juhee Cho; Katherine C Smith; Debra Roter; Eliseo Guallar; Dong-Young Noh; Daniel E Ford Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Katharine Hodgkinson; Phyllis Butow; Glenn E Hunt; Susan Pendlebury; Kim M Hobbs; Gerard Wain Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Pamela M Vacek; Patricia Winstead-Fry; Roger H Secker-Walker; Gloria J Hooper; Dennis A Plante Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Mary Davis; June L Ventura; Mary Wieners; Sharon N Covington; Vien H Vanderhoof; Mary E Ryan; Deloris E Koziol; Vaishali B Popat; Lawrence M Nelson Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2009-02-24 Impact factor: 7.329