Literature DB >> 18670888

Addressing the needs of young breast cancer survivors at the 5 year milestone: can a short-term, low intensity intervention produce change?

Joan R Bloom1, Susan L Stewart, Carol N D'Onofrio, Judith Luce, Priscilla J Banks.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Today, the 5-year relative survival rate for cancer is 65% and there are 10.5 million survivors. The largest group of survivors are those of breast cancer. Reductions in mortality are occurring at a greater rate for women under age 50 at diagnosis than among older women. AIMS: Our goal was to design a socio-educational intervention for 5-year survivors aged 50 or younger at diagnosis and test the hypotheses that women in the intervention group would show greater improvement than controls with respect to (1) knowledge of breast cancer, its treatment, and long-term health concerns; (2) lifestyle habits (i.e., exercise and diet); and (3) communication with family and physicians.
METHODS: Using a randomized controlled trial with a pre-post design, 404 women who were 5 years from diagnosis and cancer-free (response rate 54%) were randomly assigned to an intervention or delayed intervention (control) group and were assessed at pre-test (baseline) and 6 months later (96% retention). The intervention consisted of three 6-h workshops over a 3 month period. Four series of workshops were held at different geographical areas in the greater San Francisco Bay Area. The workshops included activities and information to promote physical, social, emotional, and spiritual well-being. The intervention design was based on findings from focus groups and a survey of 185 cancer-free 5-year survivors that assessed changes since the early months after diagnosis in physical, social, emotional, and spiritual concerns (response rate 73%).
RESULTS: Consistent with our first hypothesis, at post-test, women in the intervention group, on average, had greater knowledge regarding breast cancer, its treatment, and their own future health than did those in the control group (p = 0.015). Hypothesis 2 was partially supported as women in the intervention group were more likely than the control group to report an increased amount of physical activity (p = 0.036), but not significant dietary changes. Social support was related to increased self report of physical activity. With the exception of the last series of workshops, the intervention group did not report improved communications with family, friends, and physicians (hypothesis 3).
CONCLUSIONS: A short-term intervention can affect knowledge levels and physical activity but not diet or communication in the family. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The intervention was related to greater knowledge related to breast cancer, and increased report of physical activity. The program was not related to changes in reported diet or family communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18670888     DOI: 10.1007/s11764-008-0058-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Surviv        ISSN: 1932-2259            Impact factor:   4.442


  56 in total

1.  Social networks, social support, and survival after breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Candyce H Kroenke; Laura D Kubzansky; Eva S Schernhammer; Michelle D Holmes; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Quality of life in cancer patients--an hypothesis.

Authors:  K C Calman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Randomized trial of peer counseling on reproductive health in African American breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Leslie R Schover; Rosell Jenkins; Dawen Sui; Jennifer Harned Adams; Michelle S Marion; Karen Eubanks Jackson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Factors related to sexual function in postmenopausal women with a history of breast cancer.

Authors:  G A Greendale; L Petersen; L Zibecchi; P A Ganz
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  A randomized intervention study for breast cancer survivors in Japan: effects of short-term support group focused on possible breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Mika Miyashita
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.592

6.  Psychological and fitness changes associated with exercise participation among women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Bernardine M Pinto; Matthew M Clark; Nancy C Maruyama; Susan I Feder
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Effects of social relationships on survival for women with breast cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  N Waxler-Morrison; T G Hislop; B Mears; L Kan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 8.  Pathophysiology and implications of cancer treatment-induced bone loss.

Authors:  Richard L Theriault
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.990

9.  Meta-analysis of the effects of psychosocial interventions on survival time in cancer patients.

Authors:  Geir Smedslund; Gerd Inger Ringdal
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 10.  Multi-dimensional quality of life among long-term (5+ years) adult cancer survivors.

Authors:  Joan R Bloom; Dana M Petersen; Soo H Kang
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  35 in total

1.  Cancer screening of long-term cancer survivors.

Authors:  Jessica R Schumacher; Whitney P Witt; Mari Palta; Noelle K Loconte; Susan M Heidrich; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Nancy Pandhi; Maureen A Smith
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.657

2.  Post-treatment regret among young breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Joan R Bloom
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 3.  Updated evidence in support of diet and exercise interventions in cancer survivors.

Authors:  Dorothy W Pekmezi; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  Making lifestyle changes after colorectal cancer: insights for program development.

Authors:  D L Dennis; J L Waring; N Payeur; C Cosby; H M L Daudt
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 5.  A contextual approach to understanding breast cancer survivorship among Latinas.

Authors:  Maria Lopez-Class; Jessika Gomez-Duarte; Kristi Graves; Kimlin Ashing-Giwa
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Psychological distress among adult cancer survivors: importance of survivorship care plan.

Authors:  S Cristina Oancea; Vinay K Cheruvu
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  Psychosocial outcomes and interventions among cancer survivors diagnosed during adolescence and young adulthood (AYA): a systematic review.

Authors:  Marie Barnett; Glynnis McDonnell; Antonio DeRosa; Tammy Schuler; Errol Philip; Lisa Peterson; Kaitlin Touza; Sabrina Jhanwar; Thomas M Atkinson; Jennifer S Ford
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 4.442

8.  Survivorship services for adult cancer populations: a pan-Canadian guideline.

Authors:  D Howell; T F Hack; T K Oliver; T Chulak; S Mayo; M Aubin; M Chasen; C C Earle; A J Friedman; E Green; G W Jones; J M Jones; M Parkinson; N Payeur; C M Sabiston; S Sinclair
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Young Women with Breast Cancer: A Focus Group Study of Unmet Needs.

Authors:  Kathryn J Ruddy; Mary L Greaney; Kim Sprunck-Harrild; Meghan E Meyer; Karen M Emmons; Ann H Partridge
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.223

10.  Online support groups for young women with breast cancer: a proof-of-concept study.

Authors:  Joanne Stephen; Adina Rojubally; Wolfgang Linden; Lihong Zhong; Gina Mackenzie; Sahar Mahmoud; Janine Giese-Davis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.