C W Cheng1, I J Das, B Stea. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson 85724.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to answer the following questions in breast irradiation: (a) How many calculation planes are sufficient for three-dimensional (3-D) treatment planning? (b) Is pseudo-3-D planning system sufficiently accurate for 3-D treatment planning of a breast? METHODS AND MATERIALS: We carried out dose calculations and differential dose-volume analysis on three representative patients covering the range of breast size encountered in a clinic. The breast volumes were reconstructed from computed tomography (CT) scans using three slices, five slices and the full CT scan respectively. An established 3-D dose algorithm and two pseudo-3-D commercial systems were used in the calculations. Comparison of isodose distributions were made between the central axis plane, a cephalic and a caudal plane 6 cm above or below the central axis respectively. RESULTS: When comparing isodose distributions generated with conventional two-dimensional treatment planning with 3-D dose calculations, the former underestimated the size and magnitude of the hot spots in the medial and the lateral subcutaneous (SC) regions. When comparing the three-slice with the full CT model, while the three-slice model was found to be adequate for the "small" and the "medium" size patients, the full CT model provided a more accurate representation of dose distributions for the "large" patient. Comparison of a true 3-D algorithm with pseudo-3-D algorithms showed that while the latter systems were adequate for the "small" and the "medium" patients, significant differences were noted between the true 3-D and the pseudo-3-D algorithms for the "large" patient. CONCLUSION: For patients whose breast contours vary slowly within the tangential fields, a three-slice CT scan as well as a pseudo-3-D approach appears to be adequate for clinical decision. However, for patients with large variation of contours within the tangential fields, a full scale CT scan with a true 3-D dose algorithm is more accurate than either the three-slice or the five-slice model.
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to answer the following questions in breast irradiation: (a) How many calculation planes are sufficient for three-dimensional (3-D) treatment planning? (b) Is pseudo-3-D planning system sufficiently accurate for 3-D treatment planning of a breast? METHODS AND MATERIALS: We carried out dose calculations and differential dose-volume analysis on three representative patients covering the range of breast size encountered in a clinic. The breast volumes were reconstructed from computed tomography (CT) scans using three slices, five slices and the full CT scan respectively. An established 3-D dose algorithm and two pseudo-3-D commercial systems were used in the calculations. Comparison of isodose distributions were made between the central axis plane, a cephalic and a caudal plane 6 cm above or below the central axis respectively. RESULTS: When comparing isodose distributions generated with conventional two-dimensional treatment planning with 3-D dose calculations, the former underestimated the size and magnitude of the hot spots in the medial and the lateral subcutaneous (SC) regions. When comparing the three-slice with the full CT model, while the three-slice model was found to be adequate for the "small" and the "medium" size patients, the full CT model provided a more accurate representation of dose distributions for the "large" patient. Comparison of a true 3-D algorithm with pseudo-3-D algorithms showed that while the latter systems were adequate for the "small" and the "medium" patients, significant differences were noted between the true 3-D and the pseudo-3-D algorithms for the "large" patient. CONCLUSION: For patients whose breast contours vary slowly within the tangential fields, a three-slice CT scan as well as a pseudo-3-D approach appears to be adequate for clinical decision. However, for patients with large variation of contours within the tangential fields, a full scale CT scan with a true 3-D dose algorithm is more accurate than either the three-slice or the five-slice model.
Authors: X Allen Li; An Tai; Douglas W Arthur; Thomas A Buchholz; Shannon Macdonald; Lawrence B Marks; Jean M Moran; Lori J Pierce; Rachel Rabinovitch; Alphonse Taghian; Frank Vicini; Wendy Woodward; Julia R White Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2009-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038