Literature DB >> 8082347

Reduced dose bolus alteplase vs conventional alteplase infusion for pulmonary embolism thrombolysis. An international multicenter randomized trial. The Bolus Alteplase Pulmonary Embolism Group.

S Z Goldhaber, G Agnelli, M N Levine.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that a reduced dose of bolus recombinant human tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) (0.6 mg/kg/15 min, maximum of 50 mg) would result in fewer bleeding complications than standard 100 mg of rt-PA administered as a continuous infusion over 2 h among hemodynamically stable patients with pulmonary embolism (PE). Subsidiary objectives were to compare the two rt-PA regimens with respect to the following: (1) the rate of other adverse clinical events; (2) the magnitude of change from baseline on perfusion lung scans, pulmonary angiograms, or echocardiograms; and (3) the differences in coagulation parameters over time.
DESIGN: A double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: Twenty-eight participating hospitals in the United States, Italy, and Canada. PATIENTS: Patients could be included if they had symptoms or signs of PE within 14 days of presentation as well as high-probability lung scans and/or pulmonary angiograms demonstrating PE.
INTERVENTIONS: Randomization was undertaken with a 2:1 allocation ratio to rt-PA 0.6 mg/kg/15 min (maximum of 50 mg) or to 100 mg/2 h. Ninety patients were randomized, and 87 patients were treated: 60 with bolus rt-PA and 27 with 2-h rt-PA. All patients underwent baseline and 20- to 28-h follow-up perfusion lung scintigraphy. Patients at angiogram centers underwent baseline and 2-h follow-up angiography, while patients at echocardiogram centers underwent baseline, 3-h, and 20- to 28-h echocardiography. Forty-eight patients also participated in an ancillary study of serial fibrinogen and fibrin degradation product levels.
RESULTS: In the first 14 days after randomization, there were six deaths: five (8.3 percent) in the bolus group vs one death (3.7 percent) in the 2-h group (p = 0.66). There were two clinically suspected nonfatal recurrent PEs during the first 14 days after therapy, one in each treatment group. Overall, 14 patients suffered major or other important bleeding: 8 in the bolus group and 6 in the 2-h group (p = 0.35). Changes in efficacy parameters (scans, angiograms, or echocardiograms) were similar in the two treatment groups. After initiation of therapy, patients who had received bolus rt-PA had less depression of fibrinogen levels (p = 0.007) and smaller increases in fibrinogen degradation products (p = 0.013) than patients who had received 100 mg of rt-PA over 2 h.
CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were detected between the bolus rt-PA and 2-h rt-PA with respect to bleeding complications, adverse clinical events, or imaging studies. There was less fibrinogenolysis with the bolus dosing regimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8082347     DOI: 10.1378/chest.106.3.718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  31 in total

Review 1.  When should we thrombolyse patients with pulmonary embolism? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  T Harris; S Meek
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 2.  Tenecteplase to treat pulmonary embolism in the emergency department.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Kline; Jackeline Hernandez-Nino; Alan E Jones
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Clive Kearon; Elie A Akl; Anthony J Comerota; Paolo Prandoni; Henri Bounameaux; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Michael E Nelson; Philip S Wells; Michael K Gould; Francesco Dentali; Mark Crowther; Susan R Kahn
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: a practical approach. British Thoracic Society, Standards of Care Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 5.  The role of thrombolytic therapy in pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Tzu-Fei Wang; Alessandro Squizzato; Francesco Dentali; Walter Ageno
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Systemic Full Dose, Half Dose, and Catheter Directed Thrombolysis for Pulmonary Embolism. When to Use and How to Choose?

Authors:  Mohsen Sharifi
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-05

7.  [Should the indication for thrombolytic therapy in patients with pulmonary embolism be extended?].

Authors:  U Janssens
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 8.  Bleeding risk with systemic thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism: scope of the problem.

Authors:  Mitchell J Daley; Manasa S Murthy; Evan J Peterson
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2015-04

Review 9.  [Errors and risks in perioperative thrombolysis therapy].

Authors:  F Spöhr; B W Böttiger; A Walther
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 10.  Alteplase. A reappraisal of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in vascular disorders other than acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A J Wagstaff; J C Gillis; K L Goa
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.