Literature DB >> 8077548

T wave "humps" as a potential electrocardiographic marker of the long QT syndrome.

M H Lehmann1, F Suzuki, B S Fromm, D Frankovich, P Elko, R T Steinman, J Fresard, J J Baga, R T Taggart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study attempted to determine the prevalence and electrocardiographic (ECG) lead distribution of T wave "humps" (T2, after an initial T wave peak, T1) among families with long QT syndrome and control subjects.
BACKGROUND: T wave abnormalities have been suggested as another facet of familial long QT syndrome, in addition to prolongation of the rate-corrected QT interval (QTc), that might aid in the diagnosis of affected subjects.
METHODS: The ECGs from 254 members of 13 families with long QT syndrome (each with two to four generations of affected members) and from 2,948 healthy control subjects (age > or = 16 years, QTc interval 0.39 to 0.46 s) were collected and analyzed. Tracings from families with long QT syndrome were read without knowledge of QTc interval or family member status (210 blood relatives and 44 spouses).
RESULTS: We found that T2 was present in 53%, 27% and 5% of blood relatives with a "prolonged" (> or = 0.47 s, "borderline" (0.42 to 0.46 s) and "normal" (< or = 0.41 s) QTc interval, respectively (p < 0.0001), but in only 5% and 0% of spouses with a borderline and normal QTc interval, respectively (p = 0.06 vs. blood relatives). Among blood relatives with T2, the mean [+/- SD] maximal T1T2 interval was 0.10 +/- 0.03 s and correlated with the QTc interval (p < 0.01); a completely distinct U wave was seen in 23%. T2 was confined to leads V2 and V3 in 10%, whereas V4, V5, V6 or a limb lead was involved in 90% of blood relatives with T2. Among blood relatives with a borderline QTc interval, 50% of those with versus 20% of those without major symptoms manifested T2 in at least one left precordial or limb lead (p = 0.05). A T2 amplitude > 1 mm (grade III) was observed, respectively, in 19%, 6% and 0% of blood relatives with a prolonged, borderline and normal QTc interval with T2 in at least one left precordial or limb lead. Among the 2,948 control subjects, 0.6% exhibited T2 confined to leads V2 and V3, and 0.9% had T2 involving one or more left precordial lead (but none of the limb leads). Among 37 asymptomatic adult blood relatives with QTc intervals 0.42 to 0.46 s, T2 was found in left precordial or limb leads in 9 (24%; 5 with limb lead involvement) versus only 1.9% of control subjects with a borderline QTc interval (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that in families with long QT syndrome, T wave humps involving left precordial or (especially) limb leads, even among asymptomatic blood relatives with a borderline QTc interval, suggest the presence of the long QT syndrome trait.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8077548     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90024-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  10 in total

1.  Dome-and-dart T Waves and Hyperthyroidism - A Case Report.

Authors:  Matteo Parolin; Francesca Dassie; Eugenio De Carlo; Roberto Vettor; Pietro Maffei
Journal:  Eur Endocrinol       Date:  2020-02-28

2.  When u say "U Waves," what do u mean?

Authors:  Sami Viskin; David Zelster; Charles Antzelevitch
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Reproducibility of computerized measurements of QT interval from multiple leads at rest and during exercise.

Authors:  Anna-Mari Hekkala; Heikki Väänänen; Heikki Swan; Lasse Oikarinen; Matti Viitasalo; Lauri Toivonen
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Postexercise recovery phase T-wave notching in concealed long QT syndrome.

Authors:  B Sensoy; O Ozeke; U Canpolat; S Cay; F Oksuz; S Topaloglu; D Aras; S Aydogdu
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 1.443

5.  Automated T-wave analysis can differentiate acquired QT prolongation from congenital long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Alan Sugrue; Peter A Noseworthy; Vaclav Kremen; J Martijn Bos; Bo Qiang; Ram K Rohatgi; Yehu Sapir; Zachi I Attia; Peter Brady; Pedro J Caraballo; Samuel J Asirvatham; Paul A Friedman; Michael J Ackerman
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  Congenital and drug-induced long-QT syndrome: an update.

Authors:  X H T Wehrens; P A Doevendans
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Identifying drug-induced repolarization abnormalities from distinct ECG patterns in congenital long QT syndrome: a study of sotalol effects on T-wave morphology.

Authors:  Claus Graff; Mads P Andersen; Joel Q Xue; Thomas B Hardahl; Jørgen K Kanters; Egon Toft; Michael Christiansen; Henrik K Jensen; Johannes J Struijk
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Diagnostic Value of the TpTe Interval in Children with Ventricular Arrhythmias.

Authors:  Joanna Jaromin; Grażyna Markiewicz-Łoskot; Lesław Szydłowski; Agnieszka Kulawik
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Detection of Patients with Congenital and Often Concealed Long-QT Syndrome by Novel Deep Learning Models.

Authors:  Florian Doldi; Lucas Plagwitz; Lea Philine Hoffmann; Benjamin Rath; Gerrit Frommeyer; Florian Reinke; Patrick Leitz; Antonius Büscher; Fatih Güner; Tobias Brix; Felix Konrad Wegner; Kevin Willy; Yvonne Hanel; Sven Dittmann; Wilhelm Haverkamp; Eric Schulze-Bahr; Julian Varghese; Lars Eckardt
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-07-13

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of the response to the brief tachycardia provoked by standing in children suspected for long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Arja S Vink; Ben J M Hermans; Joana Pimenta; Puck J Peltenburg; Luc H P M Filippini; Nynke Hofman; Sally-Ann B Clur; Nico A Blom; Arthur A M Wilde; Tammo Delhaas; Pieter G Postema
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-03-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.