BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of the QT interval is important for diagnosing long QT syndrome (LQTS), and in research on determinants of ventricular repolarization time. We tested automatic analysis of QT intervals from multiple ECG leads on chest. METHODS: Eleven healthy volunteers and 10 genotyped LQTS patients were tested at rest and during exercise with a bicycle ergometer twice 1-31 months apart. Electrocardiograms were recorded with the body surface potential mapping system, and 12 precordial channels were selected for analysis. Averaged QT peak and QT end intervals were determined with an automated algorithm, and the difference QT end minus QT peak (Tp-e) was calculated. Repeatability was assessed by coefficient of variation (CV) between measurements. RESULTS: Within one test at rest the QT end intervals were highly repeatable with CV 0.6%. In repeated tests CV was 4.4% for QT end interval and 3.5% when the QT interval was corrected for heart rate. In exercise test at specified heart rates, mean CV was 3.0% for QT end and 2.9% for QT peak interval. The CV of Tp-e interval was 10.2% at rest, and 9.3% in exercise test. Reproducibility was comparable between healthy subjects and LQTS patients. CONCLUSIONS: The BSPM system with automated analysis produced accurate and highly repeatable QT interval measurements. Reproducibility was adequate also over prolonged time periods both at rest and in exercise stress test. The method can be applied in studying duration of ventricular repolarization time in different physiologic and pharmacologic interventions.
BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of the QT interval is important for diagnosing long QT syndrome (LQTS), and in research on determinants of ventricular repolarization time. We tested automatic analysis of QT intervals from multiple ECG leads on chest. METHODS: Eleven healthy volunteers and 10 genotyped LQTS patients were tested at rest and during exercise with a bicycle ergometer twice 1-31 months apart. Electrocardiograms were recorded with the body surface potential mapping system, and 12 precordial channels were selected for analysis. Averaged QT peak and QT end intervals were determined with an automated algorithm, and the difference QT end minus QT peak (Tp-e) was calculated. Repeatability was assessed by coefficient of variation (CV) between measurements. RESULTS: Within one test at rest the QT end intervals were highly repeatable with CV 0.6%. In repeated tests CV was 4.4% for QT end interval and 3.5% when the QT interval was corrected for heart rate. In exercise test at specified heart rates, mean CV was 3.0% for QT end and 2.9% for QT peak interval. The CV of Tp-e interval was 10.2% at rest, and 9.3% in exercise test. Reproducibility was comparable between healthy subjects and LQTS patients. CONCLUSIONS: The BSPM system with automated analysis produced accurate and highly repeatable QT interval measurements. Reproducibility was adequate also over prolonged time periods both at rest and in exercise stress test. The method can be applied in studying duration of ventricular repolarization time in different physiologic and pharmacologic interventions.
Authors: Marek Malik; Katerina Hnatkova; Velislav Batchvarov; Yi Gang; Peter Smetana; A John Camm Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: Matti Viitasalo; Lasse Oikarinen; Heikki Väänänen; Heikki Swan; Kirsi Piippo; Kimmo Kontula; Hal V Barron; Lauri Toivonen; Melvin M Scheinman Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2002-03-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: M H Lehmann; F Suzuki; B S Fromm; D Frankovich; P Elko; R T Steinman; J Fresard; J J Baga; R T Taggart Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1994-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Anna-Mari Hekkala; Heikki Swan; Matti Viitasalo; Heikki Väänänen; Lauri Toivonen Journal: Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 1.468
Authors: Kimmo Porthan; Annukka Marjamaa; Matti Viitasalo; Heikki Väänänen; Antti Jula; Lauri Toivonen; Markku S Nieminen; Christopher Newton-Cheh; Veikko Salomaa; Kimmo Kontula; Lasse Oikarinen Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2010-03-04 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Irina Mordukhovich; Robert O Wright; Chitra Amarasiriwardena; Emmanuel Baja; Andrea Baccarelli; Helen Suh; David Sparrow; Pantel Vokonas; Joel Schwartz Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-08-21 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Petri Haapalahti; Matti Viitasalo; Merja Perhonen; Heikki Väänänen; Markku Mäkijärvi; Heikki Swan; Lauri Toivonen Journal: Clin Physiol Funct Imaging Date: 2010-12-07 Impact factor: 2.273