Literature DB >> 8075184

Displaying radiologic images on personal computers: image processing and analysis.

T Gillespy1, A H Rowberg.   

Abstract

This is the fourth article of our series for radiologists and imaging scientists on displaying, manipulating, and analyzing radiologic images on personal computers. Classic image processing is divided into point, area, frame, and geometric processes. Point processes change image pixel values based on the value of the pixel of interest. Histogram equalization adjusts the pixel values in the image based on the distribution of pixel values. Area processes change the pixel of interest based on the values of the surrounding pixels, known as the neighborhood. Area processes using a convolution kernel are often used as image filters. Common convolution kernels include low-frequency, high-frequency, and edge-enhancement filters. Edge enhancement can be performed with convolution kernels such as shift and difference, gradient-directional and Laplacian filters, or with nonlinear methods such as Sobel's algorithm. Frame processes mathematically combine two or more images, often for noise reduction and background subtraction. Geometric processes alter the location of pixels within the image, but usually not the pixel values. Common radiologic applications of image processing include window width and window level adjustments (point process), adaptive histogram equalization (area process), unsharp masking (area process), computed radiography image processing (combined area and point processes), digital subtraction angiography (frame and geometric processes), region of interest analysis (area process), and image rotation (geometric process). As digital imaging becomes more widespread, radiologists need to understand the image processing that is fundamental to these modalities.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8075184     DOI: 10.1007/bf03168422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  9 in total

1.  Orientation correction for chest images.

Authors:  E Pietka; H K Huang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Recognition of chest radiograph orientation for picture archiving and communications systems display using neural networks.

Authors:  J M Boone; S Seshagiri; R M Steiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Enhancement of storage phosphor plate images: a C-language program.

Authors:  A W Templeton; L H Wetzel; L T Cook; L A Harrison; D A Eckard; W H Anderson; K S Hensley
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Design and testing of artifact-suppressed adaptive histogram equalization: a contrast-enhancement technique for display of digital chest radiographs.

Authors:  K Rehm; G W Seeley; W J Dallas; T W Ovitt; J F Seeger
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  A psychophysical comparison of two methods for adaptive histogram equalization.

Authors:  J B Zimmerman; S B Cousins; K M Hartzell; M E Frisse; M G Kahn
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Image processing in digital radiography: basic concepts and applications.

Authors:  G T Barnes; K Lauro
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Image optimization in a computed-radiography/photostimulable-phosphor system.

Authors:  R H Sherrier; H G Chotas; G A Johnson; C Chiles; C E Ravin
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Displaying radiologic images on personal computers: image storage and compression: Part 1.

Authors:  T Gillespy; A H Rowberg
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Displaying radiologic images on personal computers.

Authors:  T Gillespy; A H Rowberg
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.056

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Displaying radiologic images on personal computers: practical applications and uses.

Authors:  T Gillespy; M L Richardson; A H Rowberg
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Angiographic film subtraction using a laser digitizer and computer processing.

Authors:  J M Boone; N M Corrigan; S T Hecht; D P Link
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.056

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.