C A Orengo1, J M Thornton. 1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: By performing extensive pairwise structural comparisons, we recently identified a set of unique folds from the Brookhaven protein structure data bank. This analysis revealed considerable similarities between a large subgroup of the alpha+beta folds, which led us to re-examine the types of folds occurring in this class and the nature of the relationships between them. RESULTS: Two major alpha+beta fold groups can be distinguished. In the first, described as alpha-beta sandwiches because alpha-helices and beta-strands occupy separate and distinct layers, a split beta alpha beta motif recurs frequently. The other group, alpha-beta rolls, contains fewer helices and is more diverse. In these, the beta-sheet has folded or rolled over, providing a cradle for the alpha-helix. A beta beta beta alpha-meander motif is found throughout the alpha+beta class. CONCLUSION: Although many alpha-beta sandwiches have very similar folds, few share common functions and the active sites are distributed over the whole surface of the fold. The ability of the alpha-beta sandwich to accommodate a range of functions suggests that it is a stable fold and one that is able to adapt a number of sites to satisfy different functional requirements. In contrast, amongst the alpha-beta rolls, folds having the same roll type often have common functions.
BACKGROUND: By performing extensive pairwise structural comparisons, we recently identified a set of unique folds from the Brookhaven protein structure data bank. This analysis revealed considerable similarities between a large subgroup of the alpha+beta folds, which led us to re-examine the types of folds occurring in this class and the nature of the relationships between them. RESULTS: Two major alpha+beta fold groups can be distinguished. In the first, described as alpha-beta sandwiches because alpha-helices and beta-strands occupy separate and distinct layers, a split beta alpha beta motif recurs frequently. The other group, alpha-beta rolls, contains fewer helices and is more diverse. In these, the beta-sheet has folded or rolled over, providing a cradle for the alpha-helix. A beta beta beta alpha-meander motif is found throughout the alpha+beta class. CONCLUSION: Although many alpha-beta sandwiches have very similar folds, few share common functions and the active sites are distributed over the whole surface of the fold. The ability of the alpha-beta sandwich to accommodate a range of functions suggests that it is a stable fold and one that is able to adapt a number of sites to satisfy different functional requirements. In contrast, amongst the alpha-beta rolls, folds having the same roll type often have common functions.
Authors: T Kashiwagi; N Yamada; K Hirayama; C Suzuki; Y Kashiwagi; F Tsuchiya; Y Arata; N Kunishima; K Morikawa Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Antonio Pineda-Lucena; Jack C C Liao; John R Cort; Adelinda Yee; Michael A Kennedy; Aled M Edwards; Cheryl H Arrowsmith Journal: Protein Sci Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 6.725
Authors: Giuliano Sciara; Steven G Kendrew; Adriana E Miele; Neil G Marsh; Luca Federici; Francesco Malatesta; Giuliana Schimperna; Carmelinda Savino; Beatrice Vallone Journal: EMBO J Date: 2003-01-15 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: S Nikonov; N Nevskaya; I Eliseikina; N Fomenkova; A Nikulin; N Ossina; M Garber; B H Jonsson; C Briand; S Al-Karadaghi; A Svensson; A Aevarsson; A Liljas Journal: EMBO J Date: 1996-03-15 Impact factor: 11.598