Literature DB >> 8069051

Comparison of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the measurement of thoracic vertebral bone mineral density: compressive force versus bone mineral.

T J Myers1, J H Battocletti, M Mahesh, M Gulati, C R Wilson, F Pintar, J Reinartz.   

Abstract

31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMRS) measurements were made on human T2 and T3 vertebral bodies. The bone mineral content (BMC) of isolated vertebral bodies minus the posterior elements and disks was measured using (1) NMRS on a 3.5 T, 85 mm bore GE Medical Systems NT-150 superconducting spectrometer, (2) a Lunar Corporation DPX-L dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanner in an anterior-posterior (AP) orientation, (3) a Norland Corporation XR26 DXA scanner, also in an AP direction, and (4) a Norland Corporation model 2600 dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) densitometer in both the AP and superior-inferior (SI) directions. Vertebral body volumes were measured using a water displacement technique to determine volume bone mineral densities (VBMD). They were then compressed to failure using an electrohydraulic testing device, followed by ashing in a muffle furnace at 700 degrees C for 18 h. Correlations of BMC between NMRS and DPA, DXA and ashing were excellent (0.96 < or = r < or = 0.99); in a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test, means were not statistically different at a p level of 0.757. The correlations of VBMD between NMRS and the other methods were not as good (0.83 < or = r < or = 0.95); in a one-way ANOVA test, means were not statistically different at a p level of 0.089. BMC was a better predictor of ultimate compressive failure than VBMD for all six methods. For NMRS, the regression coefficient for BMC was r2 = 0.806, compared with r2 = 0.505 for VBMD. NMRS may prove an alternative to present methods of determining bone mineral.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8069051     DOI: 10.1007/bf01623057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  25 in total

1.  The predictive value of quantitative computed tomography for vertebral body compressive strength and ash density.

Authors:  L Mosekilde; S M Bentzen; G Ortoft; J Jørgensen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Calibration and standardization of bone mineral densitometers.

Authors:  T L Kelly; D M Slovik; R M Neer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Noninvasive evaluation of mineral content of bone without use of ionizing radiation.

Authors:  C E Brown; J R Allaway; K L Brown; J H Battocletti
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 4.  Clinical indications for bone mass measurements. A report from the Scientific Advisory Board of the National Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  In vivo 31P nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of bone mineral for evaluation of osteoporosis.

Authors:  C E Brown; J H Battocletti; R Srinivasan; J R Allaway; J Moore; P Sigmann
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  The relative contribution of trabecular and cortical bone to the strength of human lumbar vertebrae.

Authors:  S D Rockoff; E Sweet; J Bleustein
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Res       Date:  1969

7.  A postmortem correlation of four techniques of assessment of osteoporosis with force of bone compression.

Authors:  N Oyster; F W Smith
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  The relationship of bone strength and bone quantity in health, disease, and aging.

Authors:  M H Bartley; J S Arnold; R K Haslam; W S Jee
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1966-10

9.  Cancellous bone: its strength and changes with aging and an evaluation of some methods for measuring its mineral content.

Authors:  J K Weaver; J Chalmers
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1966-03       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Comparison of the compression strength of human vertebral bodies with the mass and density of apatite: a study by 31P NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  C E Brown; R Srinivasan; P Sigmann; J B Myklebust; J H Battocletti
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 8.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.