Literature DB >> 8068375

Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations.

B Sibbald1, J Addington-Hall, D Brenneman, P Freeling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High response rates to surveys help to maintain the representativeness of the sample. AIM: In the course of a wider investigation into counselling services within general practice it was decided to assess the feasibility of increasing the response rate by telephone follow up of non-respondents to a postal survey.
METHOD: A postal survey was undertaken of a random sample of 1732 general practitioners followed by telephone administration of the questionnaire to non-respondents. The identical questionnaire was administered by telephone to a separate random sample of 206 general practitioners.
RESULTS: Of 1732 general practitioners first approached by mail, 1683 were still in post of whom 881 (52%) completed the postal questionnaire and a further 494 (29%) the telephone interview. Of 206 general practitioners first contacted by telephone, 197 were still in post of whom 167 (85%) completed interviews. Compared with doctors first approached by mail, those first approached by telephone were significantly more likely to report having a partner with a special interest in psychiatry (P < 0.01); and a general practitioner, practice nurse or health visitor who worked as a counsellor (P < 0.01 in each case). A comparison of doctors first approached by telephone with those who completed telephone interviews after failing to respond to the postal questionnaire showed that postal non-respondents were significantly less likely to report having a general practitioner, practice nurse, health visitor or community psychiatric nurse who worked as a counsellor (P < 0.01 in each case).
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that non-response to the postal survey was associated with lack of activity in the study area. Telephone administration of questionnaires to postal non-respondents increased response rates to above 80% but, as telephone administration enhanced the reporting of counsellors, a social desirability bias may have been introduced.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8068375      PMCID: PMC1238925     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  3 in total

1.  Interviews or postal questionnaires? Comparisons of data about women's experiences with maternity services.

Authors:  A Cartwright
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Telephone surveys in public health research.

Authors:  A C Marcus; L A Crane
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Counsellors in English and Welsh general practices: their nature and distribution.

Authors:  B Sibbald; J Addington-Hall; D Brenneman; P Freeling
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-01-02
  3 in total
  44 in total

Review 1.  Anti-smoking advice from general practitioners: is a population-based approach to advice-giving feasible?

Authors:  T Coleman; A Wilson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Hormone replacement therapy: the views of general practitioners and practice nurses.

Authors:  P J Roberts; B Sibbald
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  When questionnaire response rates do matter: a survey of general practitioners and their views of NHS changes.

Authors:  D Armstrong; M Ashworth
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Primary care group commissioning of services: the differing priorities of general practitioners and district nurses for palliative care services.

Authors:  S Barclay; C Todd; J McCabe; T Hunt
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Does flattery work? A comparison of 2 different cover letters for an international survey of orthopedic surgeons.

Authors:  Pam Leece; Mohit Bhandari; Sheila Sprague; Marc F Swiontkowski; Emil H Schemitsch; Paul Tornetta
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Competency and educational needs in palliative care.

Authors:  Gerhild Becker; Felix Momm; Annemarie Gigl; Brigitte Wagner; Johann Baumgartner
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.704

7.  The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): current methods and evaluation of 2001 response rates.

Authors:  Holly B Shulman; Brenda Colley Gilbert; Coi Gl Msphbrenda; Amy Lansky
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Positive and negative factors in defensive medicine: a questionnaire study of general practitioners.

Authors:  N Summerton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-07

9.  Anti-smoking advice in general practice consultations: general practitioners' attitudes, reported practice and perceived problems.

Authors:  T Coleman; A Wilson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training.

Authors:  Inese Grava-Gubins; Sarah Scott
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.