Literature DB >> 10343419

Primary care group commissioning of services: the differing priorities of general practitioners and district nurses for palliative care services.

S Barclay1, C Todd, J McCabe, T Hunt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) have become more responsible for budget allocation over the years. The 1997 White Paper has signalled major changes in GPs' roles in commissioning. In general, palliative care is ranked as a high priority, and such services are therefore likely to be early candidates for commissioning. AIM: To examine the different commissioning priorities within the primary health care team (PHCT) by ascertaining the views of GPs and district nurses (DNs) concerning their priorities for the future planning of local palliative care services and the adequacy of services as currently provided.
METHOD: A postal questionnaire survey was sent to 167 GP principals and 96 registered DNs in the Cambridge area to ascertain ratings of service development priority and service adequacy, for which written comments were received.
RESULTS: Replies were received from 141 (84.4%) GPs and 86 (90%) DNs. Both professional groups agreed that the most important service developments were urgent hospice admission for symptom control or terminal care, and Marie Curie nurses. GPs gave greater priority than DNs to specialist doctor home visits and Macmillan nurses. DNs gave greater priority than GPs to Marie Curie nurses, hospital-at-home, non-cancer patients' urgent hospice admission, day care, and hospice outpatients. For each of the eight services where significant differences were found in perceptions of service adequacy, DNs rated the service to be less adequate than GPs.
CONCLUSION: The 1997 White Paper, The New NHS, has indicated that the various forms of GP purchasing are to be replaced by primary care groups (PCGs), in which both GPs and DNs are to be involved in commissioning decisions. For many palliative care services, DNs' views of service adequacy and priorities for future development differ significantly from their GP colleagues; resolution of these differences will need to be attained within PCGs. Both professional groups give high priority to the further development of quick-response clinical services, especially urgent hospice admission and Marie Curie nurses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10343419      PMCID: PMC1313368     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  32 in total

1.  Reasons for referral to a palliative nursing team.

Authors:  A Nash
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.187

2.  Palliative care in the community: views of general practitioners and district nurses in east London.

Authors:  K J Boyd
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.250

3.  Practice based health needs assessment: use of four methods in a small neighbourhood.

Authors:  S A Murray; L J Graham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-03

4.  Knowledge and perceptions of a domiciliary hospice service among general practitioners and community nurses.

Authors:  D A Seamark; C P Thorne; R V Jones; D J Gray; J F Searle
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Explorations in consultation of the public and health professionals on priority setting in an inner London health district.

Authors:  A Bowling; B Jacobson; L Southgate
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Purchasing for all: an alternative to fundholding.

Authors:  J P Graffy; J Williams
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-02-05

7.  Fundholding: the next five years.

Authors:  B Yule; A Healey; J Grimshaw
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1994-03

8.  Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: methodological considerations.

Authors:  B Sibbald; J Addington-Hall; D Brenneman; P Freeling
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Exploring consumer views of care provided by the Macmillan nurse using the critical incident technique.

Authors:  K Cox; A Bergen; I J Norman
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.187

10.  Can home care maintain an acceptable quality of life for patients with terminal cancer and their relatives?

Authors:  J Hinton
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.762

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evaluation of a scheme to enhance palliative cancer care in rural Wales.

Authors:  David Clark; Christine Ingleton; Philippa Hughes; Tom Yap; Bill Noble
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Family physicians' experiences when collaborating with district nurses in home care-based medical treatment. A grounded theory study.

Authors:  Sonja Modin; Lena Törnkvist; Anna-Karin Furhoff; Ingrid Hylander
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  The oncology nurse coordinator: role perceptions of staff members and nurse coordinators.

Authors:  Liza Monas; Orly Toren; Beatrice Uziely; David Chinitz
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2017-11-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.