Literature DB >> 8067823

Single-clamp technique: an important adjunct to myocardial and cerebral protection in coronary operations.

S F Aranki1, R J Rizzo, D H Adams, G S Couper, N M Kinchla, J S Gildea, L H Cohn.   

Abstract

To determine the myocardial and cerebral protective properties of the single cross-clamp (group I; n = 160) versus the partial occluding clamp (group II; n = 150) technique for construction of the proximal anastomoses, a retrospective analysis of 310 patients operated on by the same surgeon was performed. Group I patients were older (median age, 70 versus 64 years; p < or = 0.0001), with 83 (52%), versus 41 (27%) in group II, 70 years and older (p < or = 0.0001). More group I patients were in New York Heart Association functional class IV (42 [26%] versus 22 [15%]; p = 0.008); more required preoperative balloon counterpulsation (35 [22%] versus 16 [11%]; p = 0.006); and more required emergent operation (20 [13%] versus 3 [2%]; p < or = 0.0001). Antegrade crystalloid cardioplegia was used in both groups. The median cross-clamp time was 58 minutes for group I versus 44 minutes for group II (p < or = 0.0001). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the number of bypass grafts, the use of the mammary artery, or the bypass time. The operative mortality was 2.5% (n = 4) for group I versus 5.3% (n = 8) for group II (p = 0.16), and the perioperative myocardial infarction/low cardiac output state was seen in 6 patients (3.8%) in group I versus 18 patients (12%) in group II (p = 0.006). The median creatine kinase MB release was 13 U/L for group I versus 19 U/L for group II (p = 0.0029).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8067823     DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)92196-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  8 in total

1.  Application of a manifold system for temporary reperfusion during proximal anastomoses in conventional coronary bypass surgery.

Authors:  K Hisatomi; Y Moriyama; G Yotsumoto; A Kobayashi; R Toda; S Shimokawa; A Taira
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Surgical Approaches to Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Farzan Filsoufi; David H. Adams
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2002-02

Review 3.  Stroke associated with coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Keiji Oi; Hirokuni Arai
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-07-08

4.  Intra-aortic filtration: capturing particulate emboli during aortic cross-clamping.

Authors:  Jan T Christenson; Dominique L Vala; Marc Licker; Jorge Sierra; Afksendiyos Kalangos
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2005

5.  Which aortic clamp strategy is better to reduce postoperative stroke and death: Single center report and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liyu Chen; Xiumeng Hua; Jiangping Song; Liqing Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Extraanatomical coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severely atherosclerotic (Porcelain) aorta.

Authors:  Gokce Sirin; Kamil Sarkislali; Murat Konakci; Ergun Demirsoy
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 1.637

7.  Effects of single aortic clamping versus partial aortic clamping techniques on post-operative stroke during coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Ihsan Sami Uyar; Mehmet Besir Akpinar; Veysel Sahin; Feyzi Abacilar; Volkan Yurtman; Faik Fevzi Okur; Ugur Ozdemir; Mehmet Ates
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.167

8.  Neurological complications are avoidable during CABG.

Authors:  Zulfiqar Haider; Anjum Jalal; Asif Rashid Alamgir; Irfan Rasheed
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.