Literature DB >> 8066515

Distinguishable groups of musculoskeletal low back pain patients and asymptomatic control subjects based on physical measures of the NIOSH Low Back Atlas.

M T Moffroid1, L D Haugh, S M Henry, B Short.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: The authors performed an empirical prospective study of 115 patients referred to physical therapy for low back pain and 112 control subjects of similar age and gender.
OBJECTIVES: The authors defined and compared subgroups based on physical tests and described demographic and psychosocial characteristics by group. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Prospective studies of intervention for persons with low back pain are limited by inability to randomize subjects into distinguishable groups. Previous attempts have not been empirical and have not focused on musculoskeletal LBP.
METHODS: Ten physical therapists administered 52 tests and 6 questionnaires to subjects in seven different clinics. Data were subjected to reliability and cluster and comparative analyses.
RESULTS: Tests were reliable. Groups were distinguished by measures of symmetry, flexibility, strength, and dynamic mobility.
CONCLUSION: Distinguishable groups can be determined; decreased trunk mobility characterized all groups of patients and imbalances in muscle length, strength, and symmetry described specific groups of subjects with and without low back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8066515     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199406000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Increased dynamic regulation of postural tone through Alexander Technique training.

Authors:  T W Cacciatore; V S Gurfinkel; F B Horak; P J Cordo; K E Ames
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 2.161

2.  Subclassification of low back pain: a cross-country comparison.

Authors:  Evdokia V Billis; Christopher J McCarthy; Jacqueline A Oldham
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Aetiology of low back pain in Mulago Hospital, Uganda.

Authors:  Moses Galukande; Stephen Muwazi; Didace B Mugisa
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.927

4.  Further examination of modifying patient-preferred movement and alignment strategies in patients with low back pain during symptomatic tests.

Authors:  Linda R Van Dillen; Katrina S Maluf; Shirley A Sahrmann
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2007-11-26

5.  Reliability of novice raters in using the movement system impairment approach to classify people with low back pain.

Authors:  Sharon M Henry; Linda R Van Dillen; Andrea R Trombley; Justine M Dee; Janice Y Bunn
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2012-07-15

Review 6.  Physiotherapy movement based classification approaches to low back pain: comparison of subgroups through review and developer/expert survey.

Authors:  Nicholas V Karayannis; Gwendolen A Jull; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 2.362

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.