Literature DB >> 8064205

Analysis of a claims database for the identification of patients with carcinoma of the breast.

L J Solin1, A Legorreta, D J Schultz, H A Levin, S Zatz, R L Goodman.   

Abstract

To develop and optimize algorithms for the identification of newly diagnosed and treated cases of women with carcinoma of the breast, an analysis was performed of cases identified from the claims database of a large health maintenance organization (U.S. Healthcare). An initial algorithm was developed from the patterns of claims which suggested common clinical presentations of carcinoma of the breast, and the positive predictive value was 88% (411/469). To attempt to improve upon the positive predictive value, multiple modifications of the initial algorithm were performed. The best identified modification of the initial algorithm yielded a positive predictive value of 93% (400/432) with a loss of only 3% (11/411) of the true positive cases. These results demonstrate that logic-based algorithms can be used as a valid and efficient method of identifying large numbers of cases from claims data with specific clinical characteristics. The best algorithm identified provides a powerful and accurate tool to perform health care analysis and research on large populations of women with newly diagnosed and treated carcinoma of the breast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8064205     DOI: 10.1007/bf00999321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  15 in total

Review 1.  Use of insurance claims data in measuring quality of care.

Authors:  K N Lohr
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Software for health care analysts: a modular approach.

Authors:  L L Roos; A Wajda; S M Sharp; J P Nicol
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Assessing data quality: a computerized approach.

Authors:  L L Roos; S M Sharp; A Wajda
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Use of claims data systems to evaluate health care outcomes. Mortality and reoperation following prostatectomy.

Authors:  J E Wennberg; N Roos; L Sola; A Schori; R Jaffe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-02-20       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Accuracy of diagnostic coding for Medicare patients under the prospective-payment system.

Authors:  D C Hsia; W M Krushat; A B Fagan; J A Tebbutt; R P Kusserow
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-02-11       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Using computers to identify complications after surgery.

Authors:  L L Roos; S M Cageorge; E Austen; K N Lohr
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer.

Authors:  A B Nattinger; M S Gottlieb; J Veum; D Yahnke; J S Goodwin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-04-23       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Geographic variation in the treatment of localized breast cancer.

Authors:  D C Farrow; W C Hunt; J M Samet
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-04-23       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Utilization and charges for terminal cancer patients in Rhode Island.

Authors:  W D Spector; V Mor
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.730

10.  Centralization, certification, and monitoring. Readmissions and complications after surgery.

Authors:  L L Roos; S M Cageorge; N P Roos; R Danzinger
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of an algorithm to identify women with carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  L J Solin; S MacPherson; D J Schultz; N A Hanchak
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Effects of health insurance and race on colorectal cancer treatments and outcomes.

Authors:  R G Roetzheim; N Pal; E C Gonzalez; J M Ferrante; D J Van Durme; J P Krischer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  French claims data as a source of information to describe cancer incidence: predictive values of two identification methods of incident prostate cancers.

Authors:  Chantal Marie Couris; Arnaud Seigneurin; Sabiha Bouzbid; Muriel Rabilloud; Paul Perrin; Xavier Martin; Cyrille Colin; Anne-Marie Schott
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Validation of Claims Algorithms for Progression to Metastatic Cancer in Patients with Breast, Non-small Cell Lung, and Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Beth L Nordstrom; Jason C Simeone; Karen G Malley; Kathy H Fraeman; Zandra Klippel; Mark Durst; John H Page; Hairong Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Cancer incidence estimation method: an Apulian experience.

Authors:  Anna M Nannavecchia; Ivan Rashid; Francesco Cuccaro; Antonio Chieti; Danila Bruno; Maria G Burgio Lo Monaco; Cinzia Tanzarella; Lucia Bisceglia
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Accuracy of administrative databases in detecting primary breast cancer diagnoses: a systematic review.

Authors:  Iosief Abraha; Alessandro Montedori; Diego Serraino; Massimiliano Orso; Gianni Giovannini; Valeria Scotti; Annalisa Granata; Francesco Cozzolino; Mario Fusco; Ettore Bidoli
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.