Literature DB >> 8063570

PMC Patient Severity Scale: derivation and validation.

W W Young1, S Kohler, J Kowalski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study describes the derivation and validation of the Patient Management Category (PMC) Severity Scale, which provides a method of assessing the overall severity of a hospitalized patient's illnesses, based on the patient's unique clinical conditions, their interaction, and the resultant, combined risk of morbidity and mortality. DATA SOURCES: Derivation of the PMC Severity Scale was based on clinical judgment together with empirical analysis of more than a half million patients discharged from acute care hospitals in Maryland during 1989. The scale was validated by using two distinct calendar years (1988 and 1990) of patients data from the same Maryland hospitals and a six-month patient database from California (1990). STUDY
DESIGN: The PMC Severity Scale is an ordinal scale with seven levels: Level 7 represents the greatest likelihood of death and major disease burden. The scale quantifies the severity of each of the patient's disease(s) and accounts for the effect of all coexisting conditions and complications. DATA EXTRACTION
METHODS: Publicly available, statewide all-payer claims databases were acquired from Maryland and California. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: The independent relationships between the PMC Severity Scale with mortality and with length of stay are statistically different across severity levels within each population tested, but the relationships are statistically similar over time. Further, the PMC Severity Scale was determined to be a stable predictor of mortality and LOS across two diverse geographic regions.
CONCLUSIONS: Since the severity of a patient's illness is one of the factors that influences the outcomes of care, the PMC Severity Scale can be used successfully as a risk adjustment tool in a variety of quality applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8063570      PMCID: PMC1070010     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  11 in total

1.  Hospital inpatient mortality. Is it a predictor of quality?

Authors:  R W Dubois; W H Rogers; J H Moxley; D Draper; R H Brook
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-12-24       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

Review 3.  Severity of illness: concepts and measurements.

Authors:  R E Stein; S L Gortmaker; E C Perrin; J M Perrin; I B Pless; D K Walker; M Weitzman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-12-26       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Staging of disease. A case-mix measurement.

Authors:  J S Gonnella; M C Hornbrook; D Z Louis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-02-03       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Identifying injuries and trauma severity in large databases.

Authors:  J C Young; D P Macioce; W W Young
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1990-10

6.  Flaws in mortality data. The hazards of ignoring comorbid disease.

Authors:  S Greenfield; H U Aronow; R M Elashoff; D Watanabe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Validating risk-adjusted mortality as an indicator for quality of care.

Authors:  J W Thomas; J J Holloway; K E Guire
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.730

8.  Defining the major trauma patient and trauma severity.

Authors:  W W Young; J C Young; J S Smith; M Rhodes
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1991-08

9.  Relationship of physician ratings of severity of illness and difficulty of clinical management to length of stay.

Authors:  C Kelleher
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Incorporating severity of illness and comorbidity in case-mix measurement.

Authors:  W W Young
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1984
View more
  9 in total

1.  Using severity measures to predict the likelihood of death for pneumonia inpatients.

Authors:  L I Iezzoni; M Shwartz; A S Ash; Y D Mackiernan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  How severity measures rate hospitalized patients.

Authors:  J S Hughes; L I Iezzoni; J Daley; L Greenberg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Judging hospitals by severity-adjusted mortality rates: the influence of the severity-adjustment method.

Authors:  L I Iezzoni; A S Ash; M Shwartz; J Daley; J S Hughes; Y D Mackiernan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Weak associations between hospital mortality rates for individual diagnoses: implications for profiling hospital quality.

Authors:  G E Rosenthal
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Do severity measures explain differences in length of hospital stay? The case of hip fracture.

Authors:  M Shwartz; L I Iezzoni; A S Ash; Y D Mackiernan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Prediction of mortality for congestive heart failure patients: results from different wards of an Italian teaching hospital.

Authors:  N Nante; M F De Marco; D Balzi; P Addari; E Buiatti
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Comorbidity as a correlate of length of stay for hospitalized patients with acute chest pain.

Authors:  K Matsui; L Goldman; P A Johnson; K M Kuntz; E F Cook; T H Lee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Risk-adjusted mortality: problems and possibilities.

Authors:  Daniel Shine
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 2.238

9.  Development and validation of an index of musculoskeletal functional limitations.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Katz; Elizabeth A Wright; John A Baron; Elena Losina
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.