Literature DB >> 8063233

Prospective multicenter study on CA 125 in postmenopausal pelvic masses.

T Maggino1, A Gadducci, V D'Addario, S Pecorelli, A Lissoni, M Stella, C Romagnolo, M Federghini, S Zucca, D Trio.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of CA 125 in comparison with transabdominal ultrasound (US) in the evaluation of postmenopausal women with pelvic mass to detect malignant epithelial ovarian tumors. Postmenopausal patients with pelvic mass were studied with gynecologic examination, US and CA 125 determination. Three hundred eighty-eight patients were entered in the study. According to stratification based on US (probably benign, equivocal, possibly malignant) and CA 125 (< 35 U/ml, negative; between 35 and 65 U/ml, borderline; > 65 U/ml, positive), 290 patients were considered eligible for surgery. Specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy of US and CA 125 were calculated with respect to histological examination. Out of 290 operated patients, 134 had a benign ovarian pathology, 34 had extraovarian benign pathology, 106 had an ovarian malignancy, and 16 presented with an extraovarian malignant pathology. The results according to ovarian malignant pathology were as follows. CA 125 (> 65 U/ml): Specificity, 92.5%; sensitivity, 71.7%; accuracy, 83.3%. CA 125 (> 35 U/ml): Specificity, 82.0%; sensitivity, 78.3%; accuracy, 80.4%. US: Specificity, 77.6%; sensitivity, 84.9%; accuracy, 80.3%. Combination of US and CA 125 (> 65 U/ml): Specificity, 96.1%; sensitivity, 91.7%; accuracy, 94.3%. Determination of CA 125 is a highly specific method in predicting ovarian cancer in postmenopausal women with a pelvic mass. The association with US significantly improves the overall accuracy and may support therapeutical decision making by distinguishing between a significant percentage of women most likely to benefit from prompt intervention and women who may be managed following minor surgical diagnostic approach, such as fine-needle aspiration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8063233     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1994.1179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  18 in total

Review 1.  Management of gynaecological cancers.

Authors:  A Melville; A Eastwood; J Kleijnen; H Kitchener; P Martin-Hirsch; L Nelson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-12

2.  Detection of the HE4 protein in urine as a biomarker for ovarian neoplasms.

Authors:  Ingegerd Hellstrom; Patrick J Heagerty; Elizabeth M Swisher; Pu Liu; Jade Jaffar; Kathy Agnew; Karl Erik Hellstrom
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 8.679

3.  fTwo novel biomarkers, mesothelin and HE4, for diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Ingegerd Hellstrom; Karl Erik Hellstrom
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2011-05-01

4.  Management of a suspicious adnexal mass: a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  J E Dodge; A L Covens; C Lacchetti; L M Elit; T Le; M Devries-Aboud; M Fung-Kee-Fung
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Detection of the HE4 protein in urine as a biomarker for ovarian neoplasms: Clinical correlates.

Authors:  John B Liao; Yuen Yee Yip; Elizabeth M Swisher; Kathy Agnew; Karl Erik Hellstrom; Ingegerd Hellstrom
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA125 for the prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass.

Authors:  Richard G Moore; D Scott McMeekin; Amy K Brown; Paul DiSilvestro; M Craig Miller; W Jeffrey Allard; Walter Gajewski; Robert Kurman; Robert C Bast; Steven J Skates
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Selected adnexal cystic masses in postmenopausal women can be safely managed by laparoscopy.

Authors:  Jeong-Won Lee; Chul Jung Kim; Ji Eun Lee; Sun-Joo Lee; Byoung Gie Kim; Je-Ho Lee; Duk-Soo Bae; Chang-Soo Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 8.  Current state of biomarker development for clinical application in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Richard G Moore; Shannon MacLaughlan; Robert C Bast
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Assessing the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm for the conservative management of women with a pelvic mass.

Authors:  Elizabeth Lokich; Marguerite Palisoul; Nicole Romano; M Craig Miller; Katina Robison; Ashley Stuckey; Paul DiSilvestro; Cara Mathews; C O Granai; Geralyn Lambert-Messerlian; Richard G Moore
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Diagnostic performance of CA 125, HE4, and risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Boyeon Kim; Yongjung Park; Banseok Kim; Hyo Jun Ahn; Kyung-A Lee; Jae Eun Chung; Sang Won Han
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 2.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.