Literature DB >> 8047420

On interocular transfer of motion aftereffects.

N J Wade1, M T Swanston, C M de Weert.   

Abstract

A brief history of quantitative assessments of interocular transfer (IOT) of the motion aftereffect (MAE) is presented. Recent research indicates that the MAE occurs as a consequence of adapting detectors for relative rather than retinal motion. When gratings above and below a stationary, fixated grating are moved in an otherwise dark field the central, retinally stationary grafting appears to move in the opposite direction; when tested with stationary gratings an MAE is almost entirely confined to the central grating. The IOT of such an MAE was measured in experiment 1: the display was presented to one eye with a black field in the other. The IOT was about 30% of the monocular MAE. Similar values were found in experiment 2, in which the contralateral eye received an equivalent central stationary grating during adaptation and test. The dichoptic interaction of the processes involved in the MAE was examined by presenting the central gratings to both eyes and a single flanking grating above in one eye and below in the other (experiment 3). The MAE was tested with either the same or the contralateral pairing. Oppositely directed MAEs were found for the central and flanking gratings, but they were confined mainly to the conditions in which the configurations presented during adaptation were present in the same eyes during test. In experiment 4, the surround MAEs were compared after adaptation with two moving gratings in one eye or with a similar dichoptic configuration, and they were of similar duration. In a final experiment the MAE was tested either monocularly or binocularly after alternating adaptation of the left and right eyes and was found to be of the same duration. It is concluded that the MAE is a consequence of adapting relational-motion detectors, which are either monocular or of the binocular OR class.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8047420     DOI: 10.1068/p221365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  9 in total

1.  The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Gillian Rhodes; Kai-Markus Müller; Linda Jeffery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The surface and deep structure of the waterfall illusion.

Authors:  Nicholas J Wade; Martina Ziefle
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-08

3.  Perceptual and neural consequences of rapid motion adaptation.

Authors:  Davis M Glasser; James M G Tsui; Christopher C Pack; Duje Tadin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  DLP-based dichoptic vision test system.

Authors:  Russell L Woods; Henry L Apfelbaum; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Retinal cross talk in the mammalian visual system.

Authors:  Xiaolan Tang; Radouil Tzekov; Christopher L Passaglia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Efferent influences on the bioelectrical activity of the retina in primates.

Authors:  Gonzalo Ortiz; J Vernon Odom; Christopher L Passaglia; Radouil T Tzekov
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Limited interaction between translation and visual motion aftereffects in humans.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Reduced surround suppression in monocular motion perception.

Authors:  Sandra Arranz-Paraíso; Jenny C A Read; Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Intramanual and intermanual transfer of the curvature aftereffect.

Authors:  Bernard J van der Horst; Maarten J A Duijndam; Myrna F M Ketels; Martine T J M Wilbers; Sandra A Zwijsen; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.