Literature DB >> 8046722

Why use a pain clinic? Management of neurogenic pain before and after referral.

H T Davies1, I K Crombie, W A Macrae.   

Abstract

Pain arising from damage or malfunction of the nervous system (for example postherpetic neuralgia, peripheral nerve injuries and the neuropathies) is often severe and resistant to standard analgesics. These patients are commonly seen in pain clinics where they receive a variety of treatments including psychotropic drugs (such as antidepressants and anticonvulsants), nerve blocks and stimulation. There is concern that the management of these difficult patients may be less than optimal where they are not seen by pain specialists. We examined a cohort of 703 patients with long-established nerve-damage pain seen in ten outpatient pain clinics. We compared their use of treatments prior to referral with the management given in the pain clinic. The majority of patients (79%) had had their pain for over 1 year before being seen in the pain clinic, yet many had not tried simple and effective treatments prior to referral. Less than a quarter had received an adequate trial of antidepressants; only one in seven had been appropriately treated with anticonvulsants; and only one in 10 had tried a nerve stimulator. All these treatments were frequently provided in the pain clinic. Referral of patients with nerve-damage pain to a pain clinic may greatly increase their access to therapies of proven value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8046722      PMCID: PMC1294646          DOI: 10.1177/014107689408700704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   18.000


  16 in total

1.  Audit of outpatients: entering the loop.

Authors:  I K Crombie; H T Davies
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-06-15

2.  Pain relief services.

Authors:  T Nash
Journal:  Br J Hosp Med       Date:  1991-01

3.  Acupuncture and chronic pain: a criteria-based meta-analysis.

Authors:  G ter Riet; J Kleijnen; P Knipschild
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  The quality of care. How can it be assessed?

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988 Sep 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The detection of psychiatric illness and psychological handicaps in a British pain clinic population.

Authors:  S P Tyrer; M Capon; D M Peterson; J E Charlton; J W Thompson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 6.  Treatment of persistent pain.

Authors:  C E Pither
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-11-18

7.  Quality-of-care assessment: choosing a method for peer review.

Authors:  R H Brook; F A Appel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-06-21       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Prolonged relief of neuralgia after regional anesthetic blocks. A call for further experimental and systematic clinical studies.

Authors:  Staffan Arnér; Ulf Lindblom; Björn A Meyerson; Carl Molander
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  Polarised views on treating neurogenic pain.

Authors:  Huw T O Davies; Iain K Crombie; William A Macrae
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Pain relief clinics under anaesthetic management in Scotland.

Authors:  W I Bisset
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 1.891

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  How do drugs relieve neurogenic pain?

Authors:  R Karlsten; T Gordh
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 2.  What is new in neuropathic pain?

Authors:  Mellar P Davis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.359

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.