Literature DB >> 8046532

Differences in case definitions as a cause of variation in reported in-hospital CPR survival.

K A Ballew1, J T Philbrick, D E Caven, J B Schorling.   

Abstract

To determine the effect of different case definitions on reported survival following in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest, the authors reviewed the charts of 411 patients for whom a nurse completed a cardiac arrest form at a university hospital during a two-year period. Survival to discharge was 16.0% for patients who required basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation (chest compression and pulmonary ventilation), 18.6% for patients who were pulseless and apneic, 23.0% for patients who were pulseless or apneic, and 28.2% for all 411 patients for whom a cardiac arrest form was completed. These results demonstrate that reported survival to discharge following in-hospital cardiac arrest varies widely depending on the case definition that is used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8046532     DOI: 10.1007/bf02599658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  8 in total

1.  Closed-chest cardiac massage.

Authors:  W B KOUWENHOVEN; J R JUDE; G G KNICKERBOCKER
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1960-07-09       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Survival rates from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: recommendations for uniform definitions and data to report.

Authors:  M S Eisenberg; R O Cummins; S Damon; M P Larsen; T R Hearne
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 3.  Recommended guidelines for uniform reporting of data from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the Utstein Style. Task Force of the American Heart Association, the European Resuscitation Council, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and the Australian Resuscitation Council.

Authors:  R O Cummins; D A Chamberlain; N S Abramson; M Allen; P Baskett; L Becker; L Bossaert; H Delooz; W Dick; M Eisenberg
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.721

4.  Numerators, denominators, and survival rates: reporting survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  M S Eisenberg; R O Cummins; M P Larsen
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.469

5.  Case and survival definitions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Effect on survival rate calculation.

Authors:  T D Valenzuela; D W Spaite; H W Meislin; L L Clark; A L Wright; G A Ewy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-01-08       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  In-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  M S Jastremski
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Low survival rate after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a county hospital.

Authors:  L J Blackhall; A Ziogas; S P Azen
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1992-10

8.  Inpatient cardiopulmonary resuscitation: is survival prediction possible?

Authors:  M E Lawrence; L Price; M Riggs
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 0.954

  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Survival after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  M H Ebell; L A Becker; H C Barry; M Hagen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Evaluating implementation of a rapid response team: considering alternative outcome measures.

Authors:  James P Moriarty; Nicola E Schiebel; Matthew G Johnson; Jeffrey B Jensen; Sean M Caples; Bruce W Morlan; Jeanne M Huddleston; Marianne Huebner; James M Naessens
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.038

3.  Incidence of treated cardiac arrest in hospitalized patients in the United States.

Authors:  Raina M Merchant; Lin Yang; Lance B Becker; Robert A Berg; Vinay Nadkarni; Graham Nichol; Brendan G Carr; Nandita Mitra; Steven M Bradley; Benjamin S Abella; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 7.598

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.