Literature DB >> 8046526

Addressing alcohol use among primary care patients: differences between family medicine and internal medicine residents.

J B Schorling1, P T Klas, J P Willems, A S Everett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether rates of addressing alcohol use differed between family medicine and internal medicine residents, and to determine whether attitudes, confidence, and perceptions affected these relationships.
SETTING: Two university outpatient clinics, one staffed by family medicine and the other by primary care and categorical internal medicine residents.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of consecutive patients who had been followed by second- and third-year residents for at least one year. MEASUREMENTS: Alcohol abuse was determined using the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (MAST), with a score > or = 5 considered positive. Rates of addressing alcohol use in the preceding year were determined by patient report and chart review. Attitudes were assessed using the Substance Abuse Attitude Survey (SAAS).
RESULTS: 334 patients of 49 residents completed the MAST. Rates of alcoholism among the patient groups were: family medicine, 8.3%; primary care, 29.1%; and categorical medicine, 18.0% (p < 0.001). Screening behavior varied by type of residency: 47% of the family medicine, 71% of the primary care, and 65% of the categorical residents' patients reported being asked about alcohol use in the preceding year (p < 0.001); chart documentation was present for 15% of the family medicine, 38% of the primary care, and 24% of the categorical residents' patients (p < 0.001). Perceived prevalence of alcohol abuse, confidence in intervening, and several scales on the SAAS were related to residency type and to addressing alcohol use, but controlling for these variables did not affect the association between residency type and either patient report or chart documentation of screening.
CONCLUSION: Rates of addressing alcohol use differed for internal medicine and family medicine residents, but were not due to differences in resident perceptions and attitudes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8046526     DOI: 10.1007/bf02599649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  22 in total

1.  A review of medical education in alcohol and other drug abuse.

Authors:  D C Lewis; R G Niven; D Czechowicz; J G Trumble
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-06-05       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Residents' attitudes, knowledge, and behavior regarding diagnosis and treatment of alcoholism.

Authors:  M M Warburg; P D Cleary; M Rohman; H N Barnes; M Aronson; T L Delbanco
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1987-06

3.  Effect of a course on students' attitudes toward substance abuse and its treatment.

Authors:  J N Chappel; T L Veach
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1987-05

4.  Underdiagnosis of alcoholism by residents in an ambulatory medical practice.

Authors:  R D Moore; F E Malitz
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1986-01

5.  The substance abuse attitude survey: an instrument for measuring attitudes.

Authors:  J N Chappel; T L Veach; R S Krug
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1985-01

6.  Prevalence and recognition of alcohol abuse in a primary care population.

Authors:  P D Cleary; M Miller; B T Bush; M M Warburg; T L Delbanco; M D Aronson
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Recognition of alcoholism and substance abuse in primary care patients.

Authors:  J L Coulehan; M Zettler-Segal; M Block; M McClelland; H C Schulberg
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1987-02

8.  The unit of analysis error in studies about physicians' patient care behavior.

Authors:  G W Divine; J T Brown; L M Frazier
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Choosing the correct unit of analysis in Medical Care experiments.

Authors:  Q E Whiting-O'Keefe; C Henke; D W Simborg
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Specialist versus general practitioner treatment of problem drinkers.

Authors:  D C Drummond; B Thom; C Brown; G Edwards; M J Mullan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-10-13       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  6 in total

1.  Medical specialization, profession, and mediating beliefs that predict stated likelihood of alcohol screening and brief intervention: targeting educational interventions.

Authors:  Ruth A Gassman
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.716

2.  Screening for problem drinking: impact on physician behavior and patient drinking habits.

Authors:  J Conigliaro; R P Lofgren; B H Hanusa
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Training physicians to help patients who drink too much.

Authors:  K A Bradley; E B Larson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Alcohol-related discussions during general medicine appointments of male VA patients who screen positive for at-risk drinking.

Authors:  Katharine A Bradley; Amee J Epler; Kristen R Bush; Jennifer L Sporleder; Christopher W Dunn; Nancy E Cochran; Clarence H Braddock; Mary B McDonell; Stephan D Fihn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Providing competency-based family medicine residency training in substance abuse in the new millennium: a model curriculum.

Authors:  J Paul Seale; Sylvia Shellenberger; Denice Crowe Clark
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Primary and secondary prevention of alcohol problems: U.S. internist attitudes and practices.

Authors:  K A Bradley; S J Curry; T D Koepsell; E B Larson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.128

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.