Literature DB >> 8045058

Endosonography of the anal sphincters: normal anatomy and comparison with manometry.

A H Sultan1, M A Kamm, C N Hudson, J R Nicholls, C I Bartram.   

Abstract

To determine the normal and anatomy in vivo, and endosonography and manometry were performed in 93 nulliparous females, and endosonography alone in 21 healthy males. Endosonography did not reveal any plane of cleavage between the components of the external and sphincter, though a changing pattern at different levels conforming to a trilaminar arrangement was apparent. The deep (proximal) aspect of the external sphincter was annular in 72% of females and 76% of males. The superficial external sphincter was elliptical in 76% and 86%, the subcutaneous part conical in 56% and 57%, respectively. The external sphincter was shorter anteriorly in females. Aberrant insertions from the external sphincter anteriorly were identified in 14%. The longitudinal muscle layer could be distinguished sonographically in all males, as the external sphincter was relatively hypoechoic, but in 60% of the females the longitudinal muscle and external sphincter were of similar echogenicity and sonographically indistinguishable. The subepithelial tissues and internal sphincter were identified in each subject. The external sphincter was thicker bilaterally (P = 0.001) in males (8.6 +/- 1 mm, mean +/- S.D.) compared to females (7.7 +/- 1.1), which related to the higher weight of the males (73 +/- 7 vs 65 +/- 11 kg, P < 0.0001). The mean maximum lateral thickness of the internal sphincter (1.8 +/- 0.5 vs 1.9 +/- 0.6) and the longitudinal muscle (2.5 +/- 0.6 vs 2.9) in females and males were not significantly different. There was no relationship between the manometric resting or squeeze pressures in the anal canal, and the internal or external sphincter thickness.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8045058     DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81819-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  16 in total

Review 1.  Fecal incontinence.

Authors:  M Lamah; D Kumar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Assessment of external anal sphincter morphology in idiopathic fecal incontinence with endocoil magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  A B Williams; A J Malouf; C I Bartram; S Halligan; M A Kamm; W A Kmiot
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Ultrasound imaging of the anal sphincter complex: a review.

Authors:  Z Abdool; A H Sultan; R Thakar
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Correlation between gross anatomical topography, sectional sheet plastination, microscopic anatomy and endoanal sonography of the anal sphincter complex in human males.

Authors:  S Al-Ali; P Blyth; S Beatty; A Duang; B Parry; I P Bissett
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-05-28       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Alteration of anal sphincter function in patients with levator avulsion: observational study.

Authors:  María Aubá Guedea; Juan Luis Alcázar Zambrano; Jorge Baixauli Fons; Leire Juez Viana; Begoña Olartecoechea Linaje; Jose Ángel Mínguez Milio
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Transrectal ultrasound, manometry, and pudendal nerve terminal latency studies in the evaluation of sphincter injuries.

Authors:  Brooke Gurland; Tracy Hull
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-08

Review 7.  Anal endosonography in faecal incontinence.

Authors:  C I Bartram; A H Sultan
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  High resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the anal sphincter using an internal coil.

Authors:  N M deSouza; W A Kmiot; R Puni; A S Hall; M Burl; C I Bartram; G M Bydder
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Thickening of the internal anal sphincter in idiopathic constipation in children.

Authors:  Alireza S Keshtgar; Harry C Ward; Graham S Clayden; Ahmad Sanei
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 10.  Management of patients with faecal incontinence.

Authors:  Jakob Duelund-Jakobsen; Jonas Worsoe; Lilli Lundby; Peter Christensen; Klaus Krogh
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.409

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.