Literature DB >> 8044958

Implantation by electrophysiologists of 100 consecutive cardioverter defibrillators with nonthoracotomy lead systems.

S A Strickberger1, J D Hummel, E Daoud, M Niebauer, B D Williamson, K C Man, L Horwood, A Schmittou, S J Kalbfleisch, J J Langberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditional lead systems for implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) require a thoracotomy for placement. Nonthoracotomy lead systems are available and are usually implanted by an electrophysiologist and a surgeon. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of ICD implantation with a nonthoracotomy lead system by electrophysiologists. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A consecutive series of 100 patients (mean age, 61 +/- 13 years, +/- SD) underwent ICD implantation with a nonthoracotomy lead system while intubated and under general anesthesia. Seventy-seven patients had coronary artery disease, 15 had idiopathic cardiomyopathy, 6 had miscellaneous heart disease, and 2 had structurally normal hearts. The mean ejection fraction was 0.29 +/- 0.13. Sixty-eight patients had suffered a cardiac arrest, and 32 had had ventricular tachycardia or syncope. All patients except 9 underwent electrophysiological testing and had failed 1 +/- 1 drug trials before ICD implantation. Three types of nonthoracotomy lead systems were used. The nonthoracotomy lead with an ICD was successfully implanted in 96 patients (96%). Of the unsuccessful implants, 1 patient did not have venous access, the passive fixation lead in 1 would not remain lodged, 1 had elevated defibrillation thresholds, and 1 developed a hemopneumothorax while venous access was being obtained. The mean defibrillation threshold was 17 +/- 6 J. The mean procedure duration was 161 +/- 57 minutes. When a subcutaneous patch was used (n = 58), the procedure duration was 189 +/- 5 minutes, and when a subcutaneous patch was not required (n = 40), the procedure lasted 123 +/- 37 minutes (P < .0001). Patients remained in the hospital 4.5 +/- 4.1 days after implantation, with no procedure-related deaths. Acute complications occurred in 10 patients; 2 had lead dislodgments, 1 with previous abdominal surgery had his abdominal cavity entered (without other complications) while the ICD pocket was being made, 1 had postoperative heart failure, 1 developed a large hematoma when anticoagulation therapy was initiated, 3 required reintubation because of excessive anesthesia, 1 developed superficial cellulitis, and 1 developed a hemopneumothorax secondary to a lacerated subclavian vein. During 6 +/- 3 months of follow-up, 2 patients developed lead fractures.
CONCLUSIONS: (1) Electrophysiologists can implant an ICD with a nonthoracotomy lead system safely and with a high success rate; (2) use of a subcutaneous patch correlates with longer procedure durations; and (3) special precautions should be taken in patients with previous abdominal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8044958     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.90.2.868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Cardiology update. I: Electrophysiology].

Authors:  P Weismüller; H J Trappe
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-01-15

2.  A comparison of pectoral and abdominal transvenous defibrillator implantation: analysis of costs and outcomes.

Authors:  M R Gold; D Froman; N G Kavesh; R W Peters; A H Foster; S R Shorofsky
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  [Implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators. How much anesthesia is necessary?].

Authors:  T Sellmann; M Winterhalter; U Herold; P Kienbaum
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Experience with unipolar pectoral defibrillation.

Authors:  R K Reddy; G H Bardy
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-03

5.  Comparison of three different automatic defibrillator implantation approaches: pectoral implantation using conscious sedation reduces procedure times and cost.

Authors:  A Bollmann; N K Kanuru; D DeLurgio; P F Walter; J C Burnette; J J Langberg
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Randomized comparison of a 90 uF capacitor three-electrode defibrillation system with a 125 uF two-electrode defibrillation system.

Authors:  M Bahu; B P Knight; R Weiss; S J Hahn; R Goyal; E G Daoud; K C Man; F Morady; S A Strickberger
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Subpectoral implantation of a cardioverter defibrillator under local anaesthesia.

Authors:  K J Lipscomb; N J Linker; A P Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Subpectoral cardioverter-defibrillator implantation using a lateral approach.

Authors:  X F Costeas; P G Strembelas; D X Markou; C I Stefanadis; P K Toutouzas
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Effect of general anesthesia on the defibrillation energy requirement in patients undergoing defibrillator implantation.

Authors:  B P Knight; F Pelosi; M Flemming; F Morady; S A Strickberger
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Intravenous sedation for cardiac procedures can be administered safely and cost-effectively by non-anesthesia personnel.

Authors:  Anna Kezerashvili; John D Fisher; Jessica DeLaney; Savi Mushiyev; Eileen Monahan; Vanessa Taylor; Soo G Kim; Kevin J Ferrick; Jay N Gross; Eugen C Palma; Andrew K Krumerman
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.