Literature DB >> 8044097

Screening and self examination for breast cancer.

J Austoker1.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the major form of cancer in women, with nearly 30,000 new cases and over 15,000 deaths in the United Kingdom each year. Breast screening by mammography has been shown in randomised trials to reduce mortality from breast cancer in women aged 50 and over. An NHS breast screening programme has been in operation in the United Kingdom since 1988. Its aim is to reduce mortality from breast cancer by 25% in the population of women invited to be screened. The uptake of mammography among the eligible population may be the single most important determinant if the programme is to be effective. Primary care teams have an important part to play in encouraging women to attend for screening and in providing information, advice, and reassurance at all stages of the screening process. To date, routine breast self examination has not been shown to be an effective method of screening for breast cancer and should not therefore be promoted as a primary screening procedure. There is, however, a case to be made for women to become more "breast aware."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8044097      PMCID: PMC2540682          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.309.6948.168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  23 in total

Review 1.  The role of breast self-examination in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  V Champion
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Breast self-examination.

Authors:  C J Baines
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Firmer evidence on the value of breast screening--the Swedish overview.

Authors:  J Chamberlain
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Mammographic screening.

Authors:  V Beral
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-06-12       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Some thoughts on why women don't do breast self-examination.

Authors:  C J Baines
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1983-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Oral retinoids. What should the prescriber known about their teratogenic hazards among women of child-bearing potential?

Authors:  A A Mitchell
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  First trimester topical tretinoin and congenital disorders.

Authors:  S S Jick; B Z Terris; H Jick
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-05-08       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  The role of breast self-examination in early breast cancer detection (results of the 5-years USSR/WHO randomized study in Leningrad).

Authors:  V F Semiglazov; V M Moiseyenko; J L Bavli; N Sh Migmanova; N K Seleznyov; R T Popova; O A Ivanova; A A Orlov; O A Chagunava; N J Barash
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 9.  Retinoids and contraception.

Authors:  D L Ceyrac; D Serfaty; H Lefrancq
Journal:  Dermatology       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 5.366

10.  Promotion of attendance for mammographic screening through general practice: a randomised trial of two strategies.

Authors:  K A Clover; S Redman; J F Forbes; R W Sanson-Fisher; J A Dickinson
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1992-01-20       Impact factor: 7.738

View more
  12 in total

1.  If you think you've got a lump, they'll screen you. Informed consent, health promotion, and breast cancer.

Authors:  N Pfeffer
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Sense about mammography.

Authors:  Mike Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Older women should receive annual breast examinations.

Authors:  R M de Souza; V M de Souza
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-09

4.  Screening for breast cancer. Consider family history also.

Authors:  S V Hodgson; S N Mohammed
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-10

5.  Screening for breast cancer. Women do examine their breasts.

Authors:  N Smith; A C Dowell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-10

6.  Screening for breast cancer. Discrepancies in studies are confusing.

Authors:  D J Watmough; F Gharabawy; F Syed
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-09-10

7.  Recruiting women for breast screening. Family Physician Model strategy.

Authors:  R G McAuley; C Rand; M Levine
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  The presentation and management of breast symptoms in general practice in South Wales. The BRIDGE Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Psychological predictors of attendance at annual breast screening examinations.

Authors:  M V Burton; R Warren; D Price; H Earl
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling.

Authors:  S Lloyd; M Watson; B Waites; L Meyer; R Eeles; S Ebbs; A Tylee
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.